Re: [siprec] Proposal for follow-on siprec work
"Parthasarathi R" <partha@parthasarathi.co.in> Fri, 17 May 2013 15:40 UTC
Return-Path: <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>
X-Original-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F213321F96D1 for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 May 2013 08:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m1xXj5kIX6TH for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 May 2013 08:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.mailhostbox.com (outbound-us1.mailhostbox.com [69.93.141.229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB7F21F96B1 for <siprec@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 May 2013 08:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from userPC (unknown [122.179.86.30]) (Authenticated sender: partha@parthasarathi.co.in) by smtp.mailhostbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2836F1908261; Fri, 17 May 2013 15:40:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=parthasarathi.co.in; s=20120823; t=1368805227; bh=KP9C5nD6bjLTB5lJcSeSHMJbBfhMqXY6rXbW9pSrRXc=; h=From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=WmQA69MrKff2p+Ed1iqbvW6nMOmK2usoXpIk1RsdOIXYVlMoZdl7P/lZ2djA1edeH f5zamO9PkRNR1QzqqfSMgkA2t/MLoZq3ltB6VdnvVFd9VNmtXpZ0YhkypdFTNMMYLF Mingrb/QuLd1PyvvDeeczc8C/F6HMj+O4XR3vX9s=
From: Parthasarathi R <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>
To: 'Paul Kyzivat' <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, 'Brian Rosen' <br@brianrosen.net>
References: <20130516194128.15788.68159.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <519539C2.4010005@alum.mit.edu> <625f68627c8289d9524879179ba37317@mail.gmail.com> <5195457E.1040400@alum.mit.edu> <01FA7EC0-FFB3-4808-BA6F-AD739D227068@brianrosen.net> <519548C1.5000903@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <519548C1.5000903@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 21:10:10 +0530
Message-ID: <007f01ce5314$d69344b0$83b9ce10$@co.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac5SeE/gHZDutnuAQxu0khTtWwhpOwAnGRnQ
Content-Language: en-us
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0C0202.51964F6B.00E6, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0
X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown
X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown
X-CTCH-Score: 0.000
X-CTCH-Rules:
X-CTCH-Flags: 0
X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000
X-CTCH-SenderID: partha@parthasarathi.co.in
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalMessages: 1
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalSpam: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalSuspected: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalBulk: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalConfirmed: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalRecipients: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalVirus: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-BlueWhiteFlag: 0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 70.87.28.138
Cc: siprec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [siprec] Proposal for follow-on siprec work
X-BeenThere: siprec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Recording Working Group Discussion List <siprec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/siprec>
List-Post: <mailto:siprec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 15:40:33 -0000
Nice to hear that MSRP is added. I'll happy to review MSRP recording. > -----Original Message----- > From: siprec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:siprec-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 2:30 AM > To: Brian Rosen > Cc: siprec@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [siprec] Proposal for follow-on siprec work > > On 5/16/13 4:51 PM, Brian Rosen wrote: > > In addition to this work, we need to extend for recording MSRP. I'll > probably contribute to a draft on that. > > This is one of the things included! > > Thanks, > Paul > > > Brian > > > > On May 16, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> > wrote: > > > >> On 5/16/13 4:25 PM, Guy Churchouse wrote: > >>> I very much support continuing with web conferencing recording as > >>> outlined. > >> > >> Thanks Guy! > >> > >> We would appreciate any suggestions you have toward refining what we > have written. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Paul > >> > >>> Guy > >>> > >>> Guy Churchouse, ENP, SSCA (SIP Certified) > >>> Book of the Month: Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and > Fire of > >>> Thinking By: Douglas Hofstadter & Emmanuel Sander > >>> Executive Vice President > >>> REVCORD Revolutionizing Voice Recording > >>> 10575 Katy Freeway, Suite 470 > >>> Houston, Texas 77024 > >>> 281-404-7040 Main > >>> 281-404-5323 Fax > >>> 866-559-2188 Toll > >>> Mobile 714-316-4952 > >>> gchurchouse.revcord Skype > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: siprec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:siprec-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf > >>> Of Paul Kyzivat > >>> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 12:56 PM > >>> To: siprec@ietf.org > >>> Subject: [siprec] Proposal for follow-on siprec work > >>> > >>> siprec'ers: > >>> > >>> I hope I'm not getting ahead of myself, but I *think* we are almost > done > >>> with the current round of siprec work. While we need to finish it, > I also > >>> think we need to be thinking about "what next". > >>> > >>> Michael Yan and I have just posted a new draft proposing some new > siprec > >>> functionality that we would like to see. We are looking to assess > the > >>> interest in this. > >>> > >>> The draft is intentionally somewhat vague, reflecting its > preliminary > >>> status. We want to refine it based on interest from the community. > I can > >>> imagine refining it in two ways: > >>> > >>> - deepening it with more detail about the functionality mentioned > >>> - broadening it with additional functionality that others feel is > >>> currently lacking from siprec. > >>> > >>> I'm posting this message to siprec, where I know there is a built- > in > >>> community of interest. But IIUC the actual process for adopting new > work > >>> of this sort will be to go back through dispatch. So I'll probably > also be > >>> posting a similar message to the dispatch mailing list. > >>> > >>> Please, we want to hear from you! > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Paul > >>> > >>> > >>> -------- Original Message -------- > >>> Subject: New Version Notification for > >>> draft-kyzivat-siprec-webconf-use-case-00.txt > >>> Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 12:41:28 -0700 > >>> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org > >>> To: Paul H. Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, Michael Yan > >>> <michael.yan@huawei.com>, Paul Kyzivat > <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> > >>> > >>> > >>> A new version of I-D, draft-kyzivat-siprec-webconf-use-case-00.txt > >>> has been successfully submitted by Paul H. Kyzivat and posted to > the > >>> IETF repository. > >>> > >>> Filename: draft-kyzivat-siprec-webconf-use-case > >>> Revision: 00 > >>> Title: Web Conference Recording Use Case > >>> Creation date: 2013-05-16 > >>> Group: Individual Submission > >>> Number of pages: 6 > >>> URL: > >>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kyzivat-siprec-webconf- > use-case- > >>> 00.txt > >>> Status: > >>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kyzivat-siprec-webconf-use- > case > >>> Htmlized: > >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kyzivat-siprec-webconf-use-case-00 > >>> > >>> > >>> Abstract: > >>> The current work of SIPREC will soon finish. As its charter > defined, > >>> SIPREC has covered industries like financial trading floors, > contact > >>> center and emergency service bureaus. But when talking about > >>> products or solutions like data or web conferencing, SIPREC is > >>> insufficient to record all aspects of calls with different > >>> interactive media channels. This draft tries to show a use > case for > >>> web conference recording and show how it can work well under > SIPREC > >>> mechanism. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> The IETF Secretariat > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> siprec mailing list > >>> siprec@ietf.org > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec > >>> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> siprec mailing list > >> siprec@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > siprec mailing list > siprec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec
- [siprec] Proposal for follow-on siprec work Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [siprec] Proposal for follow-on siprec work Guy Churchouse
- Re: [siprec] Proposal for follow-on siprec work Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [siprec] Proposal for follow-on siprec work Brian Rosen
- Re: [siprec] Proposal for follow-on siprec work Michael Smith
- Re: [siprec] Proposal for follow-on siprec work Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [siprec] Proposal for follow-on siprec work Dave Higton
- Re: [siprec] Proposal for follow-on siprec work Parthasarathi R
- Re: [siprec] Proposal for follow-on siprec work Henry Lum