Re: [Slim] XMPP-STOX example of use of lang attribute

Gunnar Hellström <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se> Tue, 07 April 2015 23:48 UTC

Authorized-sender: gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se
Message-ID: <55246CE0.4030605@omnitor.se>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 01:48:48 +0200
From: Gunnar Hellström <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com>
References: <55236EEF.2040502@omnitor.se> <3b077c1c2a574d5307b3af668aaaccfa.squirrel@ocean.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <3b077c1c2a574d5307b3af668aaaccfa.squirrel@ocean.qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/slim/-9yzQRu9fhtTta9IGBOEdrBPJlI>
Cc: slim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Slim] XMPP-STOX example of use of lang attribute
Precedence: list

Randall Gellens skrev den 2015-04-07 17:58:
>> I wanted to follow up the XMPP chat example of using the lang attribute
>> in SDP to understand how far from our goals it is.
>>
>> In chapter 6 of
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gellens-slim-negotiating-human-language-01
>> there is a reference to
>>
>> draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-chat-04  showing the use of the lang attribute
>> in SDP.
>>
>> However, that draft is now replaced bydraft-ietf-stox-chat  and the lang
>> attributes are deleted from the examples.
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-stox-chat-11
>>
>> This does not mean that the discussion in chapter 6 would be wrong. It
>> only means that the reference to the
>> SIP-XMPP-CHAT interop draft is not appropriate anymore and would need to
>> be replaced or deleted.
>> Does anyone know a good replacement?
> Hi Gunnar,
>
> The reference is only an informative example of how the current language
> SDP attribute is misunderstood to be what we want rather than what is
> specified in its definition.
I mean that we cannot keep it as a reference in the draft since it is 
not included in the current STOX draft. Even if it is informational, I 
do not think it is appropriate to reference expired IETF drafts.

Did it really not give us partially what we want and can be used as STOX 
intended, as long as we do not need directional characteristics and 
relative preference between media or absolute preference?

Gunnar


>

-- 
-----------------------------------------
Gunnar Hellström
Omnitor
gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se
+46 708 204 288

[Slim] XMPP-STOX example of use of lang attribute Gunnar Hellström
Re: [Slim] XMPP-STOX example of use of lang attri… Randall Gellens
Re: [Slim] XMPP-STOX example of use of lang attri… Gunnar Hellström
Re: [Slim] XMPP-STOX example of use of lang attri… Randall Gellens