Re: [Slim] How to know modality in draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language
Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org> Fri, 13 October 2017 12:01 UTC
Return-Path: <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
X-Original-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399B313207A for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 05:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <l5JIYGmwqLXa>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l5JIYGmwqLXa for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 05:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from turing.pensive.org (turing.pensive.org [99.111.97.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC0412EC30 for <slim@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 05:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [99.111.97.136] (99.111.97.161) by turing.pensive.org with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9); Fri, 13 Oct 2017 05:05:17 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240623d6065b412f8c@[99.111.97.136]>
In-Reply-To: <8233c526-f66d-041e-e4eb-cad6c22b8a73@omnitor.se>
References: <376ade2a-be29-33a6-b539-5cab2b847fcd@omnitor.se> <8233c526-f66d-041e-e4eb-cad6c22b8a73@omnitor.se>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 05:01:06 -0700
To: Gunnar Hellström <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>, "slim@ietf.org" <slim@ietf.org>
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/slim/L97kYaN-CjwAjEEjCykObclycFM>
Subject: Re: [Slim] How to know modality in draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language
X-BeenThere: slim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Selection of Language for Internet Media <slim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/slim/>
List-Post: <mailto:slim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 12:01:15 -0000
At 12:46 AM +0200 7/30/17, Gunnar Hellström wrote: > The review comment on this topic was from Dale > Worley and is found in section B of: > > > <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/slim/current/msg00766.html>https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/slim/current/msg00766.html > > by the sentence about specifying a view of the speaker in video: " > > I think this mechanism needs to be described more exactly, and in > particular, it should not depend on the UA understanding which > language tags are spoken language tags." > > It is this part we have not handled: " it > should not depend on the UA understanding which > language tags are spoken language tags" > That is a general issue, not really linked to > the issue of the view of a speaker in the video > stream. Dale's suggestion of clarifying that it is the use of the exact same language tag in both the audio and video stream, rather than just a spoken tag on the video stream, is a good one. I'll add that. > > > Den 2017-07-28 kl. 14:12, skrev Gunnar Hellström: > >> I remember a comment in one of the reviews >> (maybe from Adam ?) mentioning that it would >> be good if there was a simple way to decide if >> a language tag is a sign language or a written >> or spoken language. >> We have not responded to that comment. >> >> I know one application scanning the IANA >> language registry at startup for that purpose >> and scanning for the word "sign" in the tag >> description. But that might be seen as an >> inappropriate way to use IANA registers if it >> get used by every phone in the future. >> >> What can we say about this review comment? Do >> we need to add a modality indication parameter >> in the syntax? Or shall we strictly limit >> audio to have spoken languages, video to have >> signed languages and text and webrtc data >> channels to have written languages? Or shall >> we leave this problem to implementation? >> >> /Gunnar >> > > -- > ----------------------------------------- > Gunnar Hellström > Omnitor > <mailto:gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se > +46 708 204 288 > > _______________________________________________ > SLIM mailing list > SLIM@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim -- Randall Gellens Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only -------------- Randomly selected tag: --------------- Why does every plane have two pilots? Really, you only need one pilot. Let's take out the second pilot. Let the bloody computer fly it. --Michael O'Leary, Ryanair CEO, regards eliminating co-pilots in airline operations. Interview in Bloomberg Businessweek, 2 September 2010
- [Slim] How to know modality in draft-ietf-slim-ne… Gunnar Hellström
- Re: [Slim] How to know modality in draft-ietf-sli… Gunnar Hellström
- Re: [Slim] How to know modality in draft-ietf-sli… Randall Gellens
- Re: [Slim] How to know modality in draft-ietf-sli… Randall Gellens
- Re: [Slim] How to know modality in draft-ietf-sli… Gunnar Hellström