Re: [Slim] Is the use of spoken/written language tag appropriate in draft-ietf-negotiating-human-language

Gunnar Hellström <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se> Sat, 29 July 2017 22:35 UTC

Return-Path: <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>
X-Original-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5230C12942F for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 15:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gGxNzmgxLHG7 for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 15:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bin-vsp-out-01.atm.binero.net (vsp-unauthed02.binero.net [195.74.38.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A28412EACD for <slim@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 15:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Halon-ID: 23a0bce3-74ae-11e7-b257-005056917a89
Authorized-sender: gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se
Received: from [172.20.7.164] (unknown [65.216.242.51]) by bin-vsp-out-01.atm.binero.net (Halon) with ESMTPSA id 23a0bce3-74ae-11e7-b257-005056917a89; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 00:34:55 +0200 (CEST)
To: "slim@ietf.org" <slim@ietf.org>, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
References: <82c9d45e-9a00-3ecd-e8ba-7f48ffaa9e1b@omnitor.se>
From: Gunnar Hellström <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>
Message-ID: <efa51a33-7d40-b6d4-c02a-d9bcd79986d4@omnitor.se>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2017 00:34:51 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <82c9d45e-9a00-3ecd-e8ba-7f48ffaa9e1b@omnitor.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/slim/SebH0Hm5JZGuPbV18_9Q_IkZ7hM>
Subject: Re: [Slim] Is the use of spoken/written language tag appropriate in draft-ietf-negotiating-human-language
X-BeenThere: slim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Selection of Language for Internet Media <slim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/slim/>
List-Post: <mailto:slim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 22:35:06 -0000

The earlier discussion of this topic is found in:

https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/slim/current/msg00757.html


Den 2017-07-28 kl. 14:24, skrev Gunnar Hellström:
> We got a comment from Addison Phillips that use of the term 
> "spoken/written language tag" would not be appropriate to use. It was 
> reworded at the place where it was used.
>
> Later, the same wording reappeared in section 5.4:
>
> "the behavior when specifying a spoken/
>  written language tag for a video media stream"
>
> This use of the term may also be inappropriate and should be reworded.
>
> I have not understood the reasoning why it was inappropriate in the 
> first case, so I cannot judge.
>
> /Gunnar
>
>

-- 
-----------------------------------------
Gunnar Hellström
Omnitor
gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se
+46 708 204 288