Re: [Slim] Issue 43: How to know the modality of a language indication?

Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org> Mon, 16 October 2017 01:09 UTC

Return-Path: <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
X-Original-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8BCE1332DA for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 18:09:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <f48Q7JsAnmq6>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f48Q7JsAnmq6 for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 18:09:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from turing.pensive.org (turing.pensive.org [99.111.97.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D961332D4 for <slim@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 18:09:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.60.54] (99.111.97.161) by turing.pensive.org with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9); Sun, 15 Oct 2017 18:13:52 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240600d609b742af25@[172.20.60.54]>
In-Reply-To: <84fb37bd-5c7a-90ea-81fd-d315faabfd96@omnitor.se>
References: <CAOW+2dtSOgp3JeiSVAttP+t0ZZ-k3oJK++TS71Xn7sCOzMZNVQ@mail.gmail.com> <p06240606d607257c9584@172.20.60.54> <fb9e6b79-7bdd-9933-e72e-a47bc8c93b58@omnitor.se> <CAOW+2dtteOadptCT=yvfmk01z-+USfE4a7JO1+u_fkTp72ygNA@mail.gmail.com> <da5cfaea-75f8-3fe1-7483-d77042bd9708@alum.mit.edu> <b2611e82-2133-0e77-b72b-ef709b1bba3c@omnitor.se> <1b0380ef-b57d-3cc7-c649-5351dc61f878@alum.mit.edu> <CAOW+2dtVE5BDmD2qy_g-asXvxntif4fVC8LYO4j7QLQ5Kq2E+g@mail.gmail.com> <3fc6d055-08a0-2bdb-f6e9-99b94efc49df@alum.mit.edu> <84fb37bd-5c7a-90ea-81fd-d315faabfd96@omnitor.se>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 18:09:40 -0700
To: Gunnar Hellström <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
Cc: slim@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/slim/Y-MK5bWuvPcvt3fSTou16iVbEVo>
Subject: Re: [Slim] Issue 43: How to know the modality of a language indication?
X-BeenThere: slim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Selection of Language for Internet Media <slim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/slim/>
List-Post: <mailto:slim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 01:09:46 -0000

At 11:22 PM +0200 10/15/17, Gunnar Hellström wrote:

>  Where does this discussion take us? Should we modify section 5.4 again?

No.  That should be for follow-on work.

-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
The First Amendment is often inconvenient. But that is besides the
point.  Inconvenience does not absolve the government of its
obligation to tolerate speech. --Justice Anthony Kennedy, in 91-155