Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5084 (6835)
Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Fri, 04 February 2022 22:29 UTC
Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F7D3A261E for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 14:29:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zDEkOMp884-4 for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 14:29:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAA0C3A261B for <smime@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 14:29:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BDE424B434; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 14:29:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p6ESLMgtE5hJ; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 14:29:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.16] (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD755424B435; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 14:29:45 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220203215255.1FA9AEB6D0@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 14:29:44 -0800
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, IETF SMIME <smime@ietf.org>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <74FE0D59-1A8C-4069-B6B4-0BEA858073D0@amsl.com>
References: <20220203215255.1FA9AEB6D0@rfc-editor.org>
To: ericcro@amazon.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/smime/0IPLt3oi1DC6HLjvD9MgT5S9Nfk>
Subject: Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5084 (6835)
X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMIME Working Group <smime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/smime/>
List-Post: <mailto:smime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 22:29:50 -0000
Greetings, We note that this erratum reports the same issue as was reported in errata report 4727 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4727). As such, we have deleted this report. Please let us know any concerns. Thank you. RFC Editor/cs > On Feb 3, 2022, at 1:52 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5084, > "Using AES-CCM and AES-GCM Authenticated Encryption in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6835 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Eric Crockett <ericcro@amazon.com> > > Section: 3.2 > > Original Text > ------------- > A brief summary of the properties of AES-CCM is provided in Section 1.5. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > A brief summary of the properties of AES-GCM is provided in Section 1.5. > > Notes > ----- > Sections 3.2 and 1.5 are about AES-GCM, the text refers to AES-CCM. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC5084 (draft-ietf-smime-cms-aes-ccm-and-gcm-03) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Using AES-CCM and AES-GCM Authenticated Encryption in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) > Publication Date : November 2007 > Author(s) : R. Housley > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : S/MIME Mail Security > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
- [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5084 (6835) RFC Errata System
- Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5084 (… Russ Housley
- Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5084 (… Chris Smiley
- Re: [smime] [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] R… Benjamin Kaduk