[smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5652 (7863)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 21 March 2024 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3275C15154A for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ptD4L7gAMmOj for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 772EAC18DBB8 for <smime@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 4712011FCE6; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: heas@shrubbery.nbet, housley@vigilsec.com, smime@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240321153018.4712011FCE6@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:30:18 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/smime/VRL-tgdNwgc_ZzC7lT2k7pNnch4>
Subject: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5652 (7863)
X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMIME Working Group <smime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/smime/>
List-Post: <mailto:smime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:30:23 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5652,
"Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7863

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: heasley <heas@shrubbery.nbet>

Section: 5.2

Original Text
-------------
"... and the content
   field of the EncapsulatedContentInfo value MUST be omitted."

Corrected Text
--------------
"... and the eContent
   field of the EncapsulatedContentInfo value MUST be omitted."

Notes
-----
No 'content' field exists and I do not think this is referring to another structure.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC5652 (draft-ietf-smime-rfc3852bis-00)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
Publication Date    : September 2009
Author(s)           : R. Housley
Category            : DRAFT STANDARD
Source              : S/MIME Mail Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG