Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5652 (7863)

Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com> Thu, 21 March 2024 18:10 UTC

Return-Path: <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928F9C151083 for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bfhV_7barioY for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE87FC14F693 for <smime@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC40A424B432; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J3pJLOIFIhBH; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:641:300:5fb0:9188:3670:b6cc:385c] (unknown [IPv6:2601:641:300:5fb0:9188:3670:b6cc:385c]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 94E98424B427; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240321153018.4712011FCE6@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:10:17 -0700
Cc: heas@shrubbery.nbet, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, smime@ietf.org, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <38FC3AF9-E53B-4FF6-A2D4-74C936752832@amsl.com>
References: <20240321153018.4712011FCE6@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com>, Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/smime/nNx7XvbzuG_9QUPwxwARCKr0bRA>
Subject: Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5652 (7863)
X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMIME Working Group <smime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/smime/>
List-Post: <mailto:smime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 18:10:22 -0000

Hi Deb and Paul,

We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial, so we changed the Type to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/).

Note: The smime WG has concluded, so we are sending this to you both as ADs of the Security Area.

You may review the report at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7863

Information on how to verify errata reports can be found at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/

Further information on errata can be found at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php

Thank you.

RFC Editor/rv



> On Mar 21, 2024, at 8:30 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5652,
> "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7863
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: heasley <heas@shrubbery.nbet>
> 
> Section: 5.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> "... and the content
>   field of the EncapsulatedContentInfo value MUST be omitted."
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> "... and the eContent
>   field of the EncapsulatedContentInfo value MUST be omitted."
> 
> Notes
> -----
> No 'content' field exists and I do not think this is referring to another structure.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5652 (draft-ietf-smime-rfc3852bis-00)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
> Publication Date    : September 2009
> Author(s)           : R. Housley
> Category            : DRAFT STANDARD
> Source              : S/MIME Mail Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>