IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sml] Adoption call: draft-happel-structured-email-00 (Structured Email)

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 15 November 2023 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: sml@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sml@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6AD5C151092 for <sml@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 06:16:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MtfNq8NmJS4a for <sml@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 06:16:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93FA8C14CE55 for <sml@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 06:16:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dyas.sandelman.ca (dynamic-046-114-177-123.46.114.pool.telefonica.de [46.114.177.123]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4D3120B4B; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 14:16:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 65C5DA1BD6; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:16:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dyas (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A11A1BC0; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:16:33 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Ben Bucksch <ben.bucksch@beonex.com>
cc: sml@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <47aa7823-2768-9f32-95a3-27f7759288f0@beonex.com>
References: <65823367-5c9c-2985-b21e-a45fbaca39c3@isode.com> <4053108.1700038010@dyas> <47aa7823-2768-9f32-95a3-27f7759288f0@beonex.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Ben Bucksch <ben.bucksch@beonex.com> message dated "Wed, 15 Nov 2023 14:15:50 +0100."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:16:33 +0100
Message-ID: <4058599.1700057793@dyas>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sml/D6DCwTtQYhT_MkXH6Dx-7l3vCk4>
Subject: Re: [Sml] Adoption call: draft-happel-structured-email-00 (Structured Email)
X-BeenThere: sml@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Structured Email <sml.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sml>, <mailto:sml-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sml/>
List-Post: <mailto:sml@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sml-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sml>, <mailto:sml-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 14:16:39 -0000

Ben Bucksch <ben.bucksch@beonex.com> wrote:
    > The current question is adoption, i.e. whether we should /discuss/ this
    > document in this working group. Once adopted, we can discuss their contents
    > and the WG eventually decides whether to publish it or not. I presume your
    > answer to that is yes, based on your statement "good base for starting work".

Yes, *adopt it* and lets discuss it.

(Many IETF WGs adopt document way too late in my opinion and also the opinion
of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-gendispatch-rfc7221bis/ )

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                      *I*LIKE*TRAINS*

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email