Re: Consolidation of mailing lists

James M Galvin <galvin@tis.com> Fri, 07 May 1993 17:33 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10674; 7 May 93 13:33 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10669; 7 May 93 13:33 EDT
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18341; 7 May 93 13:33 EDT
Received: by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA08648> for ietf-archive@nri.reston.va.us; Fri, 7 May 93 13:32:18 EDT
Received: from TIS.COM by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA08644> for /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-snmp2 X-snmp2; Fri, 7 May 93 13:32:17 EDT
Received: from TIS.COM by TIS.COM (4.1/SUN-5.64) id AA08847; Fri, 7 May 93 13:33:25 EDT
Message-Id: <9305071733.AA08847@TIS.COM>
Reply-To: James M Galvin <galvin@tis.com>
To: Fred Baker <fbaker@acc.com>
Cc: snmp2@thumper.bellcore.com, snmp-sec-dev@tis.com
Subject: Re: Consolidation of mailing lists
In-Reply-To: 's message of Fri, 07 May 93 09:57:06 PDT. <9305071657.AA06290@saffron.acc.com>
Date: Fri, 07 May 93 13:33:18 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: James M Galvin <galvin@tis.com>

	silly question: why not just merge the two lists?

Sounds good to me.  I would be happy to provide the complete list of
SNMP-SEC-DEV subscribers to the list maintainer for SNMP2.  Users could
then unsubscribe if desired.

Personally, I would think that more people would want to be subscribed
than unsubscribed.  Besides, I'm willing to bet there is significant
overlap between the two lists.

Is anyone vehemently opposed to this approach?  You may reply to me
directly, rather than the list.

Jim