IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Managed Object Associations and Algorithms List?

Ed Alcoff - Prod Mtg <oldera@twg.com> Thu, 11 February 1993 21:04 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16051; 11 Feb 93 16:04 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16047; 11 Feb 93 16:04 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa25121; 11 Feb 93 16:05 EST
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16042; 11 Feb 93 16:04 EST
Received: by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA03032> for ietf-archive@nri.reston.va.us; Thu, 11 Feb 93 16:03:23 EST
Received: from eco.twg.com by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA02912> for /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-snmp2 X-snmp2; Thu, 11 Feb 93 16:02:42 EST
Received: from LOCAL.eco.twg.com by eco.twg.com (5.67/ECO.m-$Revision: 2.16 $) id AA05629; Thu, 11 Feb 93 15:59:23 -0500
Message-Id: <9302112059.AA05629@eco.twg.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1993 13:00:02 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Ed Alcoff - Prod Mtg <oldera@twg.com>
Subject: Re: Managed Object Associations and Algorithms List?
To: snmp@psi.com
Cc: snmp2@thumper.bellcore.com, snmp-sec-dev@tis.com

>>Does this mean that we can expect a call for consensus for merging the
>>SNMPv2 and SNMP lists in the near future?
>
>After a few seconds more deliberation, I'd say we'd have no more need for the
>SNMPv2 list after the IESG approves the SNMPv2 documents.  Of course that
>means we have to submit them first, which I'd like to see by the end of this
>month. 
>
>	Bob

Bob,

Then why not, after similar action with regards to SNMP 
Security, merge all 3 lists together?

Ed Alcoff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email