Re: Table idices
Randy Presuhn <rpresuhn@peer.com> Thu, 27 March 1997 19:28 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa03805; 27 Mar 97 14:28 EST
Received: from portal.ex.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18540; 27 Mar 97 14:28 EST
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id OAA00438 for snmpv2-outgoing; Thu, 27 Mar 1997 14:17:43 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 11:08:55 -0800
From: Randy Presuhn <rpresuhn@peer.com>
Message-Id: <199703271908.AA249949735@dorothy.peer.com>
To: snmp@lists.psi.com, snmpv2@tis.com
Subject: Re: Table idices
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="X-roman8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-snmpv2@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
Hi - > From: "John Leonard" <jleonard@mail1.wireless.tellabs.com> > To: "SNMPv2 List" <snmpv2@tis.com>, "SNMP List" <snmp@lists.psi.com> > Subject: Table idices > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 13:01:18 -0500 > Message-Id: <19970327175904927.AAA169@jleonard.wireless.tellabs.com> > > Hi All, > > Is there any SNMP or SNMPv2 RFC that comes out and states that INTEGER > table indices can't take the value 0? I know that there is a *very* strong > convention that they not use 0, but is this actually forbidden? > > Thanks, > John > ------------------------------------------------- > John Leonard jleonard@wireless.tellabs.com > Tellabs WSD Standard disclaimers apply > ------------------------------------------------- There is no prohibition; there is only discouragement. See RFC 1902 clause 7.7: Instances identified by use of integer-valued objects should be numbered starting from one (i.e., not from zero). The use of zero as a value for an integer-valued index object should be avoided, except in special cases. Now it's my turn: what was so scary about zero-valued indexes? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Randy Presuhn BMC Software, Inc. (Silicon Valley Division) Voice: +1 408 556-0720 (Formerly PEER Networks) http://www.bmc.com Fax: +1 408 556-0735 1190 Saratoga Avenue, Suite 130 Email: rpresuhn@bmc.com San Jose, California 95129-3433 USA --------------------------------------------------------------------- In accordance with the BMC Communications Systems Use and Security Policy memo dated December 10, 1996, page 2, item (g) (the first of two), I explicitly state that although my affiliation with BMC may be apparent, implied, or provided, my opinions are not necessarily those of BMC Software and that all external representations on behalf of BMC must first be cleared with a member of "the top management team." ---------------------------------------------------------------------
- Table idices John Leonard
- Re: Table idices Keith McCloghrie
- Re: Table idices Randy Presuhn
- Re: Table idices Bob Stewart
- RE: Table idices David Perkins
- Re: Table idices John Leonard