IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-scskf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 15 April 2013 14:51 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33FAF21F8B27; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wFhbu3cmGFut; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og102.obsmtp.com (exprod7og102.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.157]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA4121F90D9; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob102.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUWwUAcDrqF4Z9kUxw0Wx9vfqkkEmamqe@postini.com; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:51:45 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01721B80E5; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D93D7190061; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:51:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:51:45 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-scskf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6
Thread-Index: AQHOMJJp/YY1cyxg9k6UgkiMhZ9juZjS+0CAgARU0wCAAB0NAIAAYyWA//+MfECAAH0NgP//jt3QgAB5b4D//4tVwAAPCDeA
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:51:43 +0000
Message-ID: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775148E3D@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
References: <1365009642.19971.22.camel@marcin-lenovo> <515C69A4.7000903@gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EC2D7C0C5@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <30C6E4B0-BD31-4FB9-BE94-5FD8B9A1C57E@gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EC2D7C39B@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751488C7@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EC2D7C5F3@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775148BEF@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EC2D7C645@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775148D9E@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EC2D7C673@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EC2D7C673@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <A51E49C05D13274C84E5A9511033A501@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "Softwires (softwires@ietf.org)" <softwires@ietf.org>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Qi Sun <sunqi.thu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-scskf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:51:46 -0000

On Apr 15, 2013, at 10:47 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
> Does the same conclusion applies also for lw-4over6? (I'm naively assuming, given the approach defined in draft-ietf-softwire-unified-cpe, the same dhcpv6 to configure MAP will also be used lw-4over6)

I think if you're using a purely deterministic mapping, you can do lw4over6 with just the DHCPv6 option.   For deployments where dynamic allocation is desired, then you need DHCPv4-over-DHCPv6.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email