Re: [Softwires] WG last call on draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation-01

liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com> Tue, 12 June 2012 06:39 UTC

Return-Path: <maxpassion@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5742E21F8450 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.383
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.216, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xW5siwvafDQV for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F0121F844B for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbeh20 with SMTP id eh20so10852607obb.31 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=DRtOr5NgToVuEc8DU/Oio+jjFMTuWggx8UcZ+0qdaao=; b=qpJA83Fnxw792HIw7DMGyZ4wRFwWbUZcE+E3e6ps9+6bpCa8BdmdNbK/awFgfWTgOh xmH7IczsFFhAc18yO19cHvMenHbAw49Vwa1/TJmALMMwXJ6WgDZy8Ll8qcgkvI0dfZWP O2gNnkJ+lWJqlMQREYjsoZE+il28QoxzXOSjStpiNZ4jcmAAYKWAceaA3I0akSuqPhu9 0IQsdX72Fq7Ur8CNzL7+hx8jEybVIWzTV+TYqlvgcW+G5DNmR8tKsSCV+Sd7+lIsZJ9+ UTEU13q1ejDdaZucM4cmMHbRpUPLfLkX8er2Dh4Gb7kVqP02l3G8XHH74s+kk4DDPCjV Mkmw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.171.135 with SMTP id au7mr19197033oec.62.1339483169118; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.1.46 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CBFB7C93.21D2B%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
References: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E331FE64D@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CBFB7C93.21D2B%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:39:29 +0800
Message-ID: <CAKcc6Ac0a50JjuBDKR22BT1iWtfxzwaRTpzqG40GwJjt9N19=A@mail.gmail.com>
From: liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com>
To: "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@cable.comcast.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>, Yong Cui <cuiyong@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] WG last call on draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation-01
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 06:39:30 -0000

Hi Yiu,

2012/6/11, Lee, Yiu <Yiu_Lee@cable.comcast.com>:
> Hi Med and Dapeng,
>
> In order to close the gap, I suggest a slight modification:
>
> "Current standardization effort that is meant to address this IPv4
>    service continuity issue focuses mainly on stateful mechanisms that
> sharing of global IPv4 addresses between
> Customers is based upon the deployment of NAT (Network Address
>    Translation) capabilities in the network.  Because of some caveats of
>    such stateful approaches the Service Provider community feels that a
>    companion effort is required to specify stateless IPv4 over IPv6
>    approaches.  Note that the stateless solution elaborated in this
> document
> focuses on the carrier-side stateless IPv4 over IPv6 solution. States may
> still exist in other equipments such as customer-premises equipment."

I am out of office this morning thence miss your mail. I suggest to
change "may" to "should" in the above sentence.

Regards,
Dapeng Liu


> Thanks,
> Yiu
>
>
> On 6/8/12 8:12 AM, "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com"
> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:
>
>>Med: Thanks for the proposal. I shortened your proposal and updated the
>>text to:
>>
>>
>>   Current standardization effort that is meant to address this IPv4
>>   service continuity issue focuses mainly on stateful mechanisms that
>>   assume the sharing of any global IPv4 address that is left between
>>   several customers, based upon the deployment of NAT (Network Address
>>   Translation) capabilities in the network.  Because of some caveats of
>>   such stateful approaches the Service Provider community feels that a
>>   companion effort is required to specify stateless IPv4 over IPv6
>>   approaches.  Note stateless IPv4 over IPv6 solutions may be enabled
>>   in conjunction with a port-restricted NAT44 function located in the
>>   customer premises.
>>   This document provides elaboration on the need for carrier-side
>>   stateless IPv4 over IPv6 solution.
>


-- 

------
Best Regards,
Dapeng Liu