Re: [Softwires] Further draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast
Shu Yang <yangshu1988@gmail.com> Mon, 18 June 2018 16:01 UTC
Return-Path: <yangshu1988@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ACEB130ED1; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 09:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72sL7IsvceSd; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 09:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x242.google.com (mail-wr0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03325130DFE; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 09:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x242.google.com with SMTP id w7-v6so17406409wrn.6; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 09:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=U2U8U848uHNqaRyY3BGTdiqq3mLT8iGIiLGLgSGsk/Q=; b=ERP3s0ldGe/d6n1sEesm3z3VE7MsQvayq/+9KBjwPDSmP1Sf1jS4PZJjEsQh98Hc3d FJrWihF6oJyvXUCuaSS/03du0rHXF04WduVwLrMkuWuckshbspKJQJyHQNOO9lD4XyCe K2GsU1TfHevpgXU30m87RnTwxcigOeQGADGnAwv0KspLWSDW4SiLHhEuVKXDCZEz8QL0 SsHcQ3ikjmVaF9zgcrcjknXcDl9T2EuPGiNfcPKTW54sNhbolcElFV6eg9dSY1PRCTaz MIFF85OJMtz+JBNCyKWKJSV/Zd8C3j6wxvMQoHpNrWns9lYdPQG0Y+PpNuOXFJlV6teX nDLg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=U2U8U848uHNqaRyY3BGTdiqq3mLT8iGIiLGLgSGsk/Q=; b=ZrJ+6MF1FibV/1muBmlWCd4i6KR8BzYq7pYYszjMsljI3KB/ePKi9wF80Z+NL01T7w qAFR5n7OLg/wzd05I9MqK5OsU7a2t9B4ho9yyqqxfBKJoX/k3ZhFuIn+z7p1Hh7ArY4d rQOequfJuHPmkIMCoPGRdpOjTD0hHCwpelQQZ2VWZPmqzIVAX9YIXSFVHi3zjc7j3kEf YdR0tDiAxmC5fjy9b2+BPyNr3dFuWPazWLjuZJZ7f3krh3uWORbQZVzJKVj7K2qiaHo6 X4zywgVH0+NJ8peKDnnKjB6EBNr1SOB1e3kNCEfCr/1yz5+M+Z5Y2ubmnISsYmmE+oVc qKIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3QRK5pojTaLDeAvjVFo+DP0qvGylqMzV1sPXTmYxaV5bzkPoML F2+cO76ZFhdWt7RG3wuhMlwkAzFv3Qxrs57POAE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKpdvpDfgqkTW73Yh5a4J9bvnlNsCI0CB9Y+Z/uZlsaDu9B8LmLu9ZkvDSqzncZkorFmNntNvGDDcDHRPbKoYc=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:c444:: with SMTP id a4-v6mr11446372wrg.20.1529337656527; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 09:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a1c:2e92:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 09:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ABA7621F-B3A1-4084-99BD-1C7062E9A695@gmx.com>
References: <ABA7621F-B3A1-4084-99BD-1C7062E9A695@gmx.com>
From: Shu Yang <yangshu1988@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:55 +0800
Message-ID: <CAL6OX+3-FKC3nY-z5=u0EYC8Kz9uthrzLQgBd=Q6P5POrrUaOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: ianfarrer@gmx.com
Cc: draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast <draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast@ietf.org>, Softwires-wg <softwires@ietf.org>, Yong Cui <cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c24f83056eecab3f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/LaoVNlglnGtiBzH0Yy2rSnNMv4M>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Further draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 16:01:29 -0000
Hi Ian, Sorry for the late reply (because it is during a chinese traditional festival recently). The following includes the answers to the questions. > Please can you tell me if there are there any implementations in existence? Yes, the Bitway company (a networking device company in China) have implemented a prototype of it. > For the downref, to RFC4925, does this need to be a normative reference? We will move it to the informative references and update the draft asap. Best Regards, Shu Yang On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 4:25 PM, <ianfarrer@gmx.com> wrote: > Hi Authors, > > I’m currently in the process of doing the write up for the draft. Please > can you tell me if there are there any implementations in existence? > > Also, I have run v21 through ID-Nits. The important output is below. For > the downref, to RFC4925, does this need to be a normative reference? > > Please can you address these points and submit an updated version. > > Thanks, > Ian > > > Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > (See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative references > to lower-maturity documents in RFCs) > > == Unused Reference: 'RFC4291' is defined on line 677, but no explicit > reference was found in the text > > == Unused Reference: 'RFC4301' is defined on line 681, but no explicit > reference was found in the text > > == Unused Reference: 'RFC7371' is defined on line 732, but no explicit > reference was found in the text > > ** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 4925 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > Softwires@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > >