Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewersdraft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast
杨术 <yang.shu@sz.tsinghua.edu.cn> Tue, 26 April 2016 02:45 UTC
Return-Path: <yang.shu@sz.tsinghua.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B29E12D0E3 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 19:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WsRZIfLQjQBS for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 19:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sz.tsinghua.edu.cn (mail.sz.tsinghua.edu.cn [219.223.190.136]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C528A12D096 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 19:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ajax-webmail-sz.tsinghua.edu.cn (Coremail) ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:42:32 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:42:32 +0800
From: 杨术 <yang.shu@sz.tsinghua.edu.cn>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, softwires@ietf.org
Message-ID: <6b8f3697.b8b7.15450727233.Coremail.yang.shu@sz.tsinghua.edu.cn>
In-Reply-To: <201604260823452971307@cernet.edu.cn>
References: <B5E05CB1-D4ED-457C-B383-824A52C99650@gmx.com>, <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933008D5F116@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <201604260823452971307@cernet.edu.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Originating-IP: [45.79.101.10]
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Coremail Webmail Server Version 4.0.8 dev build 20140527(27298.6429.6128) Copyright (c) 2002-2016 www.mailtech.cn sz
X-SendMailWithSms: false
X-CM-TRANSID: iL7f2wDnnlqe1R5XMDAmAA--.11064W
X-CM-SenderInfo: p1dqwhxvkxq232ow2x5qjk3toohg3hdfq/1tbiAQERDVSatondsgA DsB
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Ur529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7IcSsGvfJ3iIAIbVAYjsxI4VW5Jw CS07vEb4IE77IF4wCS07vE1I0E4x80FVAKz4kxMIAIbVAFxVCaYxvI4VCIwcAKzIAtYxBI daVFxhVjvjDU=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/PZ2PwhCMUsbYNnILCbY3oS0aZbo>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewersdraft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 02:45:46 -0000
Hi, Dear Mohamed, Thank for you advices! > * This draft covers two cases: IPv4-over-IPv6 and IPv6-over-IPv4. I see a potential overlap with draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast (that passed the WGLC) for the IPv4-over-IPv6 case. Our draft focus on the mesh 4over6 case mentioned in rfc 4925. The "hub and spoke" scenario is different with the ds-lite 4over6 case in rfc 6333. > * The following section points to RFC7371. I think the authors meant https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-06. We will update the references. Shu Yang > ------------------------------------------------------------- > 发件人:mohamed.boucadair > 发送日期:2016-04-25 16:27:33 > 收件人:Ian Farrer; softwires@ietf.org > 抄送: > 主题:Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewersdraft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast > > Hi Ian, all, > > I have the following comments about this draft: > > * This draft covers two cases: IPv4-over-IPv6 and IPv6-over-IPv4. I see a potential overlap with draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast (that passed the WGLC) for the IPv4-over-IPv6 case. Unless there are some differences between these two documents for this case, I suggest to scope draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast to focus on the IPv6-over-IPv4 and add a pointer to draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast. Otherwise, it would be helpful to identify the differences between the two documents. > > * The following section points to RFC7371. I think the authors meant https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-06. > > == > 4.2. Group Address Mapping > > For IPv4-over-IPv6 scenario, a simple algorithmic mapping between > IPv4 multicast group addresses and IPv6 group addresses is supported. > [RFC7371] has already defined an applicable format. Figure 4 is the > reminder of the format: > > > +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ > | 0-------------32--40--48--56--64--72--80--88--96-----------127| > +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ > | MPREFIX64 |group address | > +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ > > > Figure 4: IPv4-Embedded IPv6 Multicast Address Format > > The MPREFIX64 for SSM mode is also defined in [RFC7371] : > > o ff3x:0:8000::/96 ('x' is any valid scope) > == > > Thank you. > > Cheers, > Med > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : Softwires [mailto:softwires-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Ian > > Farrer > > Envoyé : jeudi 7 avril 2016 16:59 > > À : softwires@ietf.org > > Objet : [Softwires] Call for reviewers draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast > > > > Hi, > > > > This document has been around for some time, but has not received any > > substantive reviews. Can I ask for volunteers who are willing to provide > > reviews? > > > > Thanks, > > Ian > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Softwires mailing list > > Softwires@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > Softwires@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > .
- Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewers draft-ietf-sof… Ian Farrer
- [Softwires] Call for reviewers draft-ietf-softwir… Ian Farrer
- Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewers draft-ietf-sof… otroan
- Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewersdraft-ietf-soft… Mingwei Xu
- Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewers draft-ietf-sof… Lishan Li
- Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewersdraft-ietf-soft… Mingwei Xu
- Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewers draft-ietf-sof… meng.wei2
- Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewers draft-ietf-sof… Ian Farrer
- Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewers draft-ietf-sof… Mingwei Xu
- Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewers draft-ietf-sof… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewers draft-ietf-sof… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewersdraft-ietf-soft… 杨术
- Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewersdraft-ietf-soft… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewers draft-ietf-sof… Mingwei Xu