Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewersdraft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast

杨术 <yang.shu@sz.tsinghua.edu.cn> Tue, 26 April 2016 02:45 UTC

Return-Path: <yang.shu@sz.tsinghua.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B29E12D0E3 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 19:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WsRZIfLQjQBS for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 19:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sz.tsinghua.edu.cn (mail.sz.tsinghua.edu.cn [219.223.190.136]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C528A12D096 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 19:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ajax-webmail-sz.tsinghua.edu.cn (Coremail) ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:42:32 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:42:32 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
From: =?utf-8?B?5p2o5pyv?= <yang.shu@sz.tsinghua.edu.cn>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, softwires@ietf.org
Message-ID: <6b8f3697.b8b7.15450727233.Coremail.yang.shu@sz.tsinghua.edu.cn>
In-Reply-To: <201604260823452971307@cernet.edu.cn>
References: <B5E05CB1-D4ED-457C-B383-824A52C99650@gmx.com>, <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933008D5F116@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <201604260823452971307@cernet.edu.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Originating-IP: [45.79.101.10]
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Coremail Webmail Server Version 4.0.8 dev build 20140527(27298.6429.6128) Copyright (c) 2002-2016 www.mailtech.cn sz
X-SendMailWithSms: false
X-CM-TRANSID: iL7f2wDnnlqe1R5XMDAmAA--.11064W
X-CM-SenderInfo: p1dqwhxvkxq232ow2x5qjk3toohg3hdfq/1tbiAQERDVSatondsgA DsB
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Ur529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7IcSsGvfJ3iIAIbVAYjsxI4VW5Jw CS07vEb4IE77IF4wCS07vE1I0E4x80FVAKz4kxMIAIbVAFxVCaYxvI4VCIwcAKzIAtYxBI daVFxhVjvjDU=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/PZ2PwhCMUsbYNnILCbY3oS0aZbo>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewersdraft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 02:45:46 -0000

Hi, Dear Mohamed,

Thank for you advices!

> * This draft covers two cases: IPv4-over-IPv6 and IPv6-over-IPv4. I see a potential overlap with draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast (that passed the WGLC) for the IPv4-over-IPv6 case.
Our draft focus on the mesh 4over6 case mentioned in rfc 4925. The "hub and spoke" scenario is different with the ds-lite 4over6 case in rfc 6333.

> * The following section points to RFC7371. I think the authors meant https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-06.   
We will update the references.

Shu Yang


> -------------------------------------------------------------
> 发件人:mohamed.boucadair
> 发送日期:2016-04-25 16:27:33
> 收件人:Ian Farrer; softwires@ietf.org
> 抄送:
> 主题:Re: [Softwires] Call for reviewersdraft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast
> 
> Hi Ian, all,
> 
> I have the following comments about this draft:
> 
> * This draft covers two cases: IPv4-over-IPv6 and IPv6-over-IPv4. I see a potential overlap with draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast (that passed the WGLC) for the IPv4-over-IPv6 case. Unless there are some differences between these two documents for this case, I suggest to scope draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast to focus on the IPv6-over-IPv4 and add a pointer to draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast. Otherwise, it would be helpful to identify the differences between the two documents. 
> 
> * The following section points to RFC7371. I think the authors meant https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-06.   
> 
> ==
> 4.2.  Group Address Mapping
> 
>    For IPv4-over-IPv6 scenario, a simple algorithmic mapping between
>    IPv4 multicast group addresses and IPv6 group addresses is supported.
>    [RFC7371] has already defined an applicable format.  Figure 4 is the
>    reminder of the format:
> 
> 
>      +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>      | 0-------------32--40--48--56--64--72--80--88--96-----------127|
>      +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>      |                    MPREFIX64                  |group  address |
>      +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
> 
> 
>            Figure 4: IPv4-Embedded IPv6 Multicast Address Format
> 
>    The MPREFIX64 for SSM mode is also defined in [RFC7371] :
> 
>    o  ff3x:0:8000::/96 ('x' is any valid scope)
> ==  
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Softwires [mailto:softwires-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Ian
> > Farrer
> > Envoyé : jeudi 7 avril 2016 16:59
> > À : softwires@ietf.org
> > Objet : [Softwires] Call for reviewers draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This document has been around for some time, but has not received any
> > substantive reviews. Can I ask for volunteers who are willing to provide
> > reviews?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Ian
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Softwires mailing list
> > Softwires@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
> .