IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] sharing restricted addresses by hosts in 4rd (draft-despres-intarea-4rd-01)

Alain Durand <adurand@juniper.net> Fri, 22 April 2011 17:24 UTC

Return-Path: <adurand@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D43E06A8 for <softwires@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.464
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.464 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.135, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hHiqfRAjYfbp for <softwires@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og105.obsmtp.com (exprod7og105.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.163]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921B5E065A for <softwires@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob105.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTbG5vgF4ku78THFZJVTV6HDxRy0gqAUr@postini.com; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:24:17 PDT
Received: from EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::c821:7c81:f21f:8bc7]) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::fc92:eb1:759:2c72%11]) with mapi; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:20:14 -0700
From: Alain Durand <adurand@juniper.net>
To: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:20:12 -0700
Thread-Topic: [Softwires] sharing restricted addresses by hosts in 4rd (draft-despres-intarea-4rd-01)
Thread-Index: AcwBEYqTJu+gjSMLQgiYCzgUNrCc9A==
Message-ID: <E01B1BA9-959B-4B29-895C-FCE153AA2C07@juniper.net>
References: <EC856C85-5329-4DD8-9788-3628E57E5F89@townsley.net> <C9D4A591.D076%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com> <BANLkTimvHehVEZuhyiwUZhYjf4=+nspk5A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimvHehVEZuhyiwUZhYjf4=+nspk5A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] sharing restricted addresses by hosts in 4rd (draft-despres-intarea-4rd-01)
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:24:18 -0000

On Apr 21, 2011, at 1:17 AM, Satoru Matsushima wrote:

> Hi Yiu,
> 
> 2011/4/21 Lee, Yiu <Yiu_Lee@cable.comcast.com>:
>> I agree that any p2p application using relay would work on 4rd.
>> 
>> For two 4rds using the same v4 address but different port-ranges, I guess
>> the two 4rd devices would communicate directly w/o BR (Section 4.5.1)
>> because 4rd CPE has mesh connectivity (over IPv6) to all other 4rds using
>> the same 4rd prefix.
> 
> Correct, thanks.
> 
> --satoru


How would you accomplish that in IPv4 without changing the IPv4 forwarding rules?

  - Alain.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email