[Softwires] sharing restricted addresses by hosts in 4rd (draft-despres-intarea-4rd-01)

Dmitry Anipko <Dmitry.Anipko@microsoft.com> Tue, 12 April 2011 00:12 UTC

Return-Path: <Dmitry.Anipko@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0188E06B0 for <softwires@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PGczh9eyArQj for <softwires@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (smtp.microsoft.com [131.107.115.214]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFF3E0715 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TK5EX14MLTC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.174) by TK5-EXGWY-E803.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.169) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:12:10 -0700
Received: from tk5-exmlt-s701.segroup.winse.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.90.63) by TK5EX14MLTC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.174) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.289.8; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:12:10 -0700
Received: from NA-EXMSG-S702.segroup.winse.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.98.200]) by tk5-exmlt-s701.segroup.winse.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.90.63]) with mapi; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:11:32 -0700
From: Dmitry Anipko <Dmitry.Anipko@microsoft.com>
To: "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:11:29 -0700
Thread-Topic: sharing restricted addresses by hosts in 4rd (draft-despres-intarea-4rd-01)
Thread-Index: Acv4pivaqL1V4ONzSNS37OqdjJGGfw==
Message-ID: <DD1A73D9E9C89144A927C5080F70285A015E3F1E01DE@NA-EXMSG-S702.segroup.winse.corp.microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [Softwires] sharing restricted addresses by hosts in 4rd (draft-despres-intarea-4rd-01)
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 00:12:24 -0000

Hi,

Since re-chartering to include 4rd has not been approved yet (as far as I know), I'm not sure if softwires is the right forum for this question, please let me know if intarea is a better one for the time being.

Draft-despres-intarea-4rd-01 allows for configuration of end hosts (since it defines CE as "a host, a router or both") with shared addresses with restricted port sets. My understanding is that usage by applications of such addresses, assigned to interfaces, may have issues - for example, those are discussed in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dec-stateless-4v6-00 . 

Should the draft include a recommendation to either avoid assigning such addresses to interfaces, and use it only in the NAT function, even when CE is a host, or, as draft-dec-stateless-4v6-00 suggests in section 3.1.2, modify the 4rd DHCP option to provide for CE ability to specify whether it is capable to function with a shared address? (since 4rd can also distribute not shared addresses / address ranges)

Thank you,
Dmitry