Re: [Softwires] Ops-dir review of draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-framework-05

Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> Fri, 09 January 2009 08:30 UTC

Return-Path: <softwires-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: softwires-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-softwires-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C69873A695E; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:30:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: softwires@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F743A692F; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:30:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.554
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.045, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KCZQ9nOSU0sA; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:30:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from netcore.fi (eunet-gw.ipv6.netcore.fi [IPv6:2001:670:86:3001::1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0133A692D; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:30:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from netcore.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netcore.fi (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n098U065026455; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:30:00 +0200
Received: from localhost (pekkas@localhost) by netcore.fi (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id n098TxtX026451; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:30:00 +0200
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 10:29:59 +0200
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: Eric Rosen <erosen@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <18524.1231267343@erosen-linux>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.0901091027070.26246@netcore.fi>
References: <18524.1231267343@erosen-linux>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LRH 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.2/8785/Fri Dec 19 10:53:51 2008 on otso.netcore.fi
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: softwire-ads@tools.ietf.org, softwires@ietf.org, ops-dir@ietf.org, softwire-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-framework@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Ops-dir review of draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-framework-05
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: softwires-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: softwires-bounces@ietf.org

I don't think it's useful to continue this debate because we just seem 
to disagree on several points.  Others may weigh in and/or draw their 
own conclusions.
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires