Re: [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure question on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast - Respond by 18/10/16

Ian Farrer <ianfarrer@gmx.com> Tue, 04 October 2016 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ianfarrer@gmx.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C8F1298B1; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 07:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6EPUaVDPUm5L; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 07:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24FC212980D; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 07:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.158] ([62.225.30.138]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Luxaj-1arOJF0SED-0101cO; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 16:49:04 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_84686565-45AD-418B-944A-B81839A2A20C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Ian Farrer <ianfarrer@gmx.com>
In-Reply-To: <98489954-21A1-4AE2-BE7B-10F9E7F7AE12@comcast.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 16:49:02 +0200
Message-Id: <D7B002AD-A14A-4BAE-B073-E22F294B4A9F@gmx.com>
References: <92E3C34A-DC4C-490C-9573-D3512DCBD6D8@gmx.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933008E23AF2@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <98489954-21A1-4AE2-BE7B-10F9E7F7AE12@comcast.com>
To: "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@comcast.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Q7UoBS8OIRpLVpn5G0uafjk8LEy3PlrLouAKeAr72BGoL9dRddp cDNaIuczD2NtIV8qsBrSY428lUe032f/fmICp95JPdmnZM5q+Apvwlg1oqT8pbxfH9wWRw+ zq8IiwKz1jTdlM5PDKZXlIl/PUVPFYibMx1CdE90MrmRN/pJ80lRlWqAVSSW1LYEaFWwCpN TuHvsexsYS37Jy/vIez+w==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:e81kdUPiNFk=:cuPzOu/cbldLhU8MLXOVbb y0VvgwcEviFjXYRkXZP1IBeO2DuOR3z2xOE29TMpOde5ayJR/hIroom+m8PY7+/aKxrYPDVz0 oyT3YovGXOwm25T5RRu0JWJ3HjJwgqwEi5siMbz5ie2Cenqzc8F8V2VnEZKVHFN1UOwRvYp8N zaLIf02AuM6D/2kNvL9cNREs+pdaUYjnePbY5YGt94TgNz21tVsw/rF7mKISEgpASPfP3cM1J STBRv3TYBeHNrzhL1RYbYVQ0Beeu75xD+NQMndI6lJryWGI0xmmGpbNocVMqoWk3mKHiCfs/y 24NFS1Tx+u+1YWsLpB97igWiQaVbdxzWFQ3iMVB7TJ0B1dLOniWwBgYlSYgqxYCqlY0EEIrZX LRMHMzf9aEqT1q8zIfBFVZpV61DntIOnzthh96aHltpbkk9K34KIr9VQ3Y5+Cf74FVnWPqi8A vrZ3CyBz6egVm/ePfgTaVYPh2YXw1JgwQJry4jDzi8OoDnk+PgpuC7d1RKDwFG7c5sZwv/kp/ IRxfHiwmfmK79eWIOtrZEZVG8D67KZDCIoA66F1VDWzByERA9ROsTlm+LQTL02fuHEGyMAKBj bNui19ZjEwft80tm7GIyl2K0vJAFhrzKjrvYygZyCElypJ5namiV1CpGv3E4FFbAREihba4PI rHH/14hQ9he6rN1g7ev/ZnRrJ/B7hn2knR9bOSnqLJrt6VOGfarLL29Wj85e7Fax78D+UIVHK UmN2QU7fjjRwFuMhseBR3c5y0WZGhjgQTEVO0l+An5UKSJal7aA/P5TnYrEVOG+ZKxmpjcuO2 Zh4hsK0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/fx7qCPv6jGnvEcv1U9Kxpg1daFs>
Cc: softwires <softwires@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure question on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast - Respond by 18/10/16
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 14:49:18 -0000

Hi Yiu,

Can you provide some information about the reasoning behind your support?

I have spent some time today reading the case studies in section 4 of RFC3669, and it would be useful to know if you think that any of these are applicable here and why.

Thanks,
Ian

> On 04 Oct 2016, at 16:37, Lee, Yiu <Yiu_Lee@comcast.com <mailto:Yiu_Lee@comcast.com>> wrote:
> 
> I support to move forward.
>  
> From: "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>>
> Date: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 3:45 AM
> To: Ian Farrer <ianfarrer@gmx.com <mailto:ianfarrer@gmx.com>>, softwires <softwires@ietf.org <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>>
> Cc: "draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org>>
> Subject: RE: [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure question on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast - Respond by 18/10/16
> Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:alias-bounces@ietf.org>>
> Resent-To: <christian.jacquenet@orange.com <mailto:christian.jacquenet@orange.com>>, <jacni@jacni.com <mailto:jacni@jacni.com>>, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>>, <yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com <mailto:yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>>, <wangqian@chinatelecom.cn <mailto:wangqian@chinatelecom.cn>>
> Resent-Date: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 3:45 AM
>  
> Re-,
>  
> As mentioned in another message, I don’t see how this IPR applies to the draft given that the patent itself cites the softwire draft in the prior art!
>  
> I support the draft to advance in the publication process.
>  
> Cheers,
> Med
>  
> De : Softwires [mailto:softwires-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:softwires-bounces@ietf.org>] De la part de Ian Farrer
> Envoyé : mardi 4 octobre 2016 09:39
> À : softwires
> Cc : draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast@ietf.org>
> Objet : [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure question on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast - Respond by 18/10/16
>  
> Hi,
>  
> A few weeks back, we sent out an question asking the WG their opinion on how to proceed with draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast in light of the IPR disclosure. No responses to this question were received.
>  
> According to RFC3669, in order for a draft with an IPR disclosure to advance there needs to be consensus of the WG. No response is not consensus to proceed.
>  
> In light of this, we ask the WG again for their opinions on how to proceed. If insufficient support is shown, then work on the draft will cease.
>  
> Please respond by 18th October.
>  
> thanks,
> Yong & Ian
>  
> Details of the IPR Disclosure are at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2873/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2873/>
>  
> United States Patent # 9,014,189
> Date Granted: April 21, 2015
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>