Re: [Softwires] MAP compatibility with DS-Lite

Wojciech Dec <wdec.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 27 November 2013 19:41 UTC

Return-Path: <wdec.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4661ADD02 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:41:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C-AmMjZJBUuo for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:41:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pb0-x22a.google.com (mail-pb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919E51ADFE3 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:37:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id uo5so11051503pbc.15 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:37:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Ta+MVQH65a0gY5COBn26W2FuqzGqSpjaA3fbT0rdTDg=; b=yE33mzdjAmIXOA3nvYJGpmfMYyqHbCgucqFdKt4bP7EEvNbFwmaTBWrG4QYI56agoC yUSbBYO88J0XgQdtJHL4zljjvVPO6PF77KcXpcntTNKofF96RUMpFVfcKq2d7L1YrRSv WHsdOgrD2ozyWT74rMwpvEv+IJM6x4yHH34y9oRkaFD0LlsmPoDRUhc8xi3Cbesiu/jy +bY08gZ9rBozzl/rInKLQ8ClL2naVXhF+OxIpGCKgzalNRgHI+4QM4MrLa9espWjEW4u UMTHqyBkd+SCDUhXCdiTXinV76mYPW6jjjL0gg3RqidqnW/0jPH8YpaykoVc90L9L2Wm ip1w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.161.194 with SMTP id xu2mr23476662pab.120.1385581052156; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:37:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.70.57.163 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:37:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52939361.2070207@viagenie.ca>
References: <528D136C.60803@viagenie.ca> <CAFFjW4i7u0UQ7=oSJovwFBZeNr_VdJtTzOnTwZtuKz=f0VnDGQ@mail.gmail.com> <528F6C88.1060508@viagenie.ca> <CAFFjW4jwf_t_8xOChYotyx+pxRAE-tZ5_=ASB772fPS44tO__A@mail.gmail.com> <CB352C8B-60E9-49BB-9DCE-62A4CDEAD7C3@employees.org> <CAFFjW4gjqh36nPZXNitMrJooOksdq99-c4NR-CZkipZ2Dcomzw@mail.gmail.com> <52939361.2070207@viagenie.ca>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:37:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFFjW4hie3rXMw4fnkTMzOf4C6MKHFyMZTT4W18zHVguVhn2jw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wojciech Dec <wdec.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b86eaae6be04804ec2dbab6"
Cc: "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] MAP compatibility with DS-Lite
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:41:52 -0000

On 25 November 2013 19:13, Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>wrote:

> Le 25/11/2013 04:39, Wojciech Dec a écrit :
>
>  Throughout, its still not been answered what is the downside of having
>> this functionality of a *MAP CPE*?
>>
>
> We've been told many times that operators don't want a zillion different
> ways of doing the same thing. This WG in particular has often been the
> target of such comments. We need to do something about it. IMHO this is one
> instance of duplication that can easily be eliminated.
>

How is describing the behaviour of a MAP CPE that has the IPv6 address of a
BR, but not an IPv4 address the duplication of anything?
Could you perhaps also stick to non-rhetorical answers.

Wojciech.

>
> Simon
>