IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-mib-12: (with COMMENT)

Dong Jiang <knight.dongjiang@gmail.com> Wed, 02 December 2015 09:14 UTC

Return-Path: <knight.dongjiang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77331A1A16; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 01:14:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7HfFJnGjSGGw; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 01:14:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x234.google.com (mail-ig0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EC061A1A14; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 01:14:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by igl9 with SMTP id 9so106496090igl.0; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 01:14:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=kSOQmNVSpA3Y8J68ypnwPjVBlXvSCP76rQfpCDOLKt4=; b=FIE2UtFXK4LF1P19AG9IM84DWBaTr4LmrTnsUEMn5dSH+G4zKs/RO0aQ+ZvzpyvkiE Ok/Yn0J0GO6NNowOknTGwUNMgw3k5hhg7HqroRMRa7JEdVPVEd91yHORB3jmHkRvu6Ox Y4hsYnuT7cMnCQLAr3iqhBGH/vmQXCkXHATjFMTXRLU285j1XPRzOw906LxFk8RDVC49 Y4vXRM1G9tZ7ZF17LokHaOFwYN99qjmCHze3E540QRdaZalO+fYCteyjUkxeCorsQXuh p53DqZEjk7Fvx6oqT2aAp5wmHZllW/4OX5NtVyjED+7o3zfsbPvEQTzc9h1FmzOwp018 BztQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.160.5 with SMTP id xg5mr2905979igb.46.1449047683916; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 01:14:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.79.38.68 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 01:14:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20151201230500.16056.17083.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20151201230500.16056.17083.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 11:14:43 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+gsSc-QMWp-E+SCVn1DSw6ToBZDwNWdkn7KqowM+yU3MYNG3A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dong Jiang <knight.dongjiang@gmail.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c31560766ca60525e6b4d0"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/lrzD6WreOu6WDQVW4uO071u8aog>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 04:28:30 -0800
Cc: softwires@ietf.org, softwire-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-mib@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-mib-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 09:14:46 -0000

Dear Ben,

Thank you for the comment. We will make these sentences clearer:

- section 5.1, first two sentences:
The text can be interpreted to mean the subtree is the mechanism for that
negotiation. I assume that's not the intent?

[Jiang] The subtree is not responsible for negotiation. We will revise the
statement.

-5.1, last sentence:
I don't understand; what different tunnel?

[Jiang] We want to explain that the encapsulation information (e.g., L2TPv3
Session ID, GRE Key, etc.) is not managed in the softwire mesh MIB. We will
revise the statement.

-8, paragraph 6:
Do the 2119 keywords in this paragaph represent new requirements
specified in this draft, or do they describe existing requirements from
SNMPv3? If the latter, please use descriptive language rather than 2119
keywords.

[Jiang] These are some requirements specified in this draft.

Thank you!

Best regards,
Jiang Dong

2015-12-02 1:05 GMT+02:00 Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>:

> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-mib-12: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-mib/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> - section 5.1, first two sentences:
> The text can be interpreted to mean the subtree is the mechanism for that
> negotiation. I assume that's not the intent?
>
> -5.1, last sentence:
> I don't understand; what different tunnel?
>
> -8, paragraph 6:
> Do the 2119 keywords in this paragaph represent new requirements
> specified in this draft, or do they describe existing requirements from
> SNMPv3? If the latter, please use descriptive language rather than 2119
> keywords.
>
> -5.1, Third sentence:
> Missing article before "Softwire mesh framework...".
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email