Re: [Softwires] any CE vendors implementing MAP-E/T?

"Armstrong, Bill R" <Bill.Armstrong@charter.com> Mon, 29 September 2014 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <Bill.Armstrong@charter.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271261A9252 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:55:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jSZdM6m-m4pr for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.chartercom.com (mail.chartercom.com [24.217.29.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE1F1ABD39 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,622,1406610000"; d="scan'208";a="312345264"
Received: from unknown (HELO KSTLMEXHTP03.CORP.CHARTERCOM.COM) ([192.168.31.174]) by mail.chartercom.com with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2014 15:38:02 -0500
Received: from KSTLMEXCP02MBX.CORP.CHARTERCOM.COM ([192.168.31.12]) by KSTLMEXHTP03.CORP.CHARTERCOM.COM ([192.168.31.174]) with mapi; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:55:24 -0500
From: "Armstrong, Bill R" <Bill.Armstrong@charter.com>
To: "Poscic, Kristian (Kristian)" <kristian.poscic@alcatel-lucent.com>, Ida Leung <ida@brumund.ca>, "cyrus@openwrt.org" <cyrus@openwrt.org>, "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:55:21 -0500
Thread-Topic: [Softwires] any CE vendors implementing MAP-E/T?
Thread-Index: Ac/cJ6/BhgHOHg3HR/isOSaoUkyIHg==
Message-ID: <D04F3128.129CF%bill.armstrong@charter.com>
References: <CALFC0Y3n7N4XrnNDm-kktfY_s94HUx1Tbzcr7CxMuRx7Ar_Grw@mail.gmail.com> <7921F977B17D5B49B8DCC955A339D2F04690F2B7@US70UWXCHMBA06.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <7921F977B17D5B49B8DCC955A339D2F04690F2B7@US70UWXCHMBA06.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.4.140807
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/qv91wJF-Sm1Ltjh_qDO2oA0n9DU
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:59:18 -0700
Subject: Re: [Softwires] any CE vendors implementing MAP-E/T?
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:28:11 -0000

I’ve heard tell that Netgear is looking at MAP.

Bill

From: <Poscic>, "Kristian (Kristian)" <kristian.poscic@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:kristian.poscic@alcatel-lucent.com>>
Date: Monday, September 29, 2014 at 9:48 AM
To: Ida Leung <ida@brumund.ca<mailto:ida@brumund.ca>>, "cyrus@openwrt.org<mailto:cyrus@openwrt.org>" <cyrus@openwrt.org<mailto:cyrus@openwrt.org>>, "softwires@ietf.org<mailto:softwires@ietf.org>" <softwires@ietf.org<mailto:softwires@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] any CE vendors implementing MAP-E/T?

I also think that there should be a commitment from CPE vendors on this.

From: Softwires [mailto:softwires-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ida Leung
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 7:41 AM
To: cyrus@openwrt.org<mailto:cyrus@openwrt.org>; softwires@ietf.org<mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] any CE vendors implementing MAP-E/T?

Steven,

It is very nice OpenWrt have the release to support the multiple softwire technology.  It is good for testing purpose.  But as a service provider who do not have in-house developer resource, we need CPE vendor to support it in order to roll it out.  Any CPE vendor in this mailing list can comment for the support of MAP-E/T and LW4o6?

Thanks,

....Ida