Re: [Softwires] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com> Fri, 11 December 2015 17:08 UTC
Return-Path: <dthaler@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C1E1B2D8B; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:08:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OwRzgSBU4yWb; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:08:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0139.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6A671B2D89; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:08:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=cY8qZbc9GM+eUc7CdCM7zmakNUNqxGtBvUoLPDrztiA=; b=eXKae4MagbH22QeQ6wYLWsL8FuKBy91zuL8MoQcgLyxlHEmYWWHom+Zt1KrqZy9QAUtn/NVNL6guj2SGVAupNF3VZN9BzSKSyAXSjC1LsMFbM6GgoWpQ8rXKzqgJaF6D7tJayIGFHGBJbUCmfaiDr28M1nE1Fjmo3eMEJSaRmeU=
Received: from BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.25) by BY2PR03MB410.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.337.19; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 17:08:41 +0000
Received: from BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.25]) by BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.25]) with mapi id 15.01.0337.024; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 17:08:41 +0000
From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
To: Yu Fu <fuyu@cnnic.cn>, 'Benoit Claise' <bclaise@cisco.com>, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHRLUDr+EWavS7qdEKPrV1+yjOCcZ7FY0IAgACu7YA=
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 17:08:41 +0000
Message-ID: <BY2PR03MB41262B23EBC5EA81BB1099FA3EA0@BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20151202203456.15996.96672.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <00b801d133de$e289c110$a79d4330$@cn>
In-Reply-To: <00b801d133de$e289c110$a79d4330$@cn>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=dthaler@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [67.182.144.235]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR03MB410; 5:4jgFWsix0AqUxKxvCSNX1wGaoL/ALsmhFeBG/QkpaFDJ7K19QKhjdhHg1Q1V11+VgVuM9SP3Qf47hCtuc91iWoakHuTpsUCLOts59O0ngsk7JIljnnE/ewMop3GdjFEa0cq9svHkQAoUa8GvPpz9hw==; 24:O3gH7tNgj0T3L6xpKMqv0BoM6KWwO9fVm0bZZA0mJSnVPaSAXBoLfqE4/PpCAXQFalFHnZNKr8lPrFesoSTBAuRJ9INiH/WtbrYwE4NJmOU=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR03MB410;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY2PR03MB4100B1791B45AA030F09AF7A3EA0@BY2PR03MB410.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(520078)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:BY2PR03MB410; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR03MB410;
x-forefront-prvs: 0787459938
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(189002)(199003)(10290500002)(2900100001)(74316001)(101416001)(99286002)(5002640100001)(2950100001)(97736004)(5001770100001)(86362001)(5008740100001)(189998001)(106356001)(105586002)(5001960100002)(77096005)(86612001)(106116001)(81156007)(5003600100002)(40100003)(1096002)(122556002)(10090500001)(8990500004)(76576001)(3846002)(586003)(1220700001)(87936001)(10400500002)(6116002)(76176999)(11100500001)(92566002)(66066001)(102836003)(33656002)(50986999)(54356999)(5004730100002)(230783001)(5005710100001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB410; H:BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Dec 2015 17:08:41.2959 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR03MB410
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/zWb9ZeYvfufySePcKuBhpe5n6t4>
Cc: "draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib@ietf.org>, "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>, "softwire-chairs@ietf.org" <softwire-chairs@ietf.org>, "cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn" <cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 17:08:46 -0000
>>7) >>dsliteAFTRAlarmProtocolType is underspecified. It¹s a string, but the >>description is very confusing as to what the legal string values are, >>making it sound more like an INTEGER was intended. >>(³This object indicate the protocol type of alarm, >> 0:tcp,1:udp,2:icmp,3:total²) E.g., does that mean the >>string is ³0:tcp² or ³0² or ³tcp² or what? > > [Yu]: We will add a clarification to describe the string as 0:tcp. Why is it a string rather than an INTEGER? Dave