[lamps] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail-05: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------


# Éric Vyncke, INT AD, comments for draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail-05

Thank you for the work put into this document. The examples of section 5 are
useful for the reader.

Please find below one nit.

Special thanks to Russ Housley for the shepherd's detailed write-up including
the WG consensus *but it lacks*  the justification of the intended status.

Please note that Tim Wicinski  is the DNS directorate reviewer and you may want
to consider this int-dir review as well when it will be available (no need to
wait for it though):
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail/reviewrequest/17830/
(and I have noted the interaction between the author and Tim for his Last Call
DNSDIR review)

I hope that this review helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric

# NITS

## Section 3

"LDH", even if defined in the RFC editor abbreviation, would benefit from an
expansion in the text.