IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spasm] CAA erratum 4515

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Fri, 17 March 2017 14:39 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B2F129450 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 07:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.197, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W5EmFaqxosqj for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 07:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x235.google.com (mail-ot0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ACC1128B44 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 07:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x235.google.com with SMTP id o24so92842200otb.1 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 07:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=fF+ATgyARX12OCzE68WDGGRbo8ijjOfh7pkej10aSCk=; b=tZCEZy79tQwqflK2BUJXCmkYHm3Hp3a4ujjbppEQUXlKO0d5rAhx4K/uwTSmsKnlea dDnhDtk5QVmVA3XFUhFXrFmNUssDLbwI4JsLtnXMJF8/OSyDuG0P9dcNSxgyO4B57vlh r5J4tdfSRB56Wd/RiSc2LNGR6RNHagA5Hn/aX+DZ0/PgvzLl4t39ICM8JIiMslT40z7Q S1wBCVsEEabErCQ+kxkiKNwDSUeeQT2MKefN23fGWFmQMHBN8q7bT1F9X7RVmrdnc0pP pvQM1onwRo51tG1AF/qf25t3wyavDhmQ/EeeHlVMpqXd2jGUgsCQ2tMgYq0rVXELclcp td6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fF+ATgyARX12OCzE68WDGGRbo8ijjOfh7pkej10aSCk=; b=GiF+Hp0z7Nvpm9UpzrHgAC0g128MfbBayneRuOT+C4OaIcYl8C1RlHDmxFh9G7q7x5 piSH9XRDjWqWKxhEYH1p6QynrFFAkRnk09FdaUuPw9lVaUEW//56at/jGPMkcqPWPC5B GjCOggvVOUX/q9aqSopWPw1y5NMHY+7/fz36Z+C95brY5J7C8nGzx4JFI4JQqFOaNHoA u0nBvzyQurdW+vE/ysHgGO3u2LnyQ81yCnIippK/n3wo2AC4VRkB65dcZPD9vgMTHRYD aVATF+Qgu4y6ba1fenxvBHIwM6VxvQUf1OYfNLdfojqvw0MVBLD3rXCZh9N153WrgXui Wp1Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2pygF6d9dlpZ3r4RnhK1HpLh8yInvmPESEnfmJyCZKKqA/73CHYlt97xVBjVYKWTyc705REXnKi0QlFQ==
X-Received: by 10.157.4.141 with SMTP id 13mr8724796otm.243.1489761581360; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 07:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.157.14.123 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 07:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <269e5cb2-41f9-2605-759c-2478d816e591@eff.org>
References: <79cf5707-693e-abf0-9e35-5dcc94a3e877@eff.org> <CAErg=HFtk0EKASTpWwNVhcT4zk2+ei-KPv=cMYDQej2oGJi=rw@mail.gmail.com> <9c55abf5-b81b-d9cb-c88c-7ea5bc6390c8@eff.org> <CAErg=HGT7FyDKgm8cAUojhGDOzLUkn=bw1Xdghbqnxw-79zQiw@mail.gmail.com> <20170311201904.GQ7733@mournblade.imrryr.org> <fede5d8f9f2c43518d8a3c502c60558a@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <389a248f-37e4-9ff7-b330-b840e7c47931@eff.org> <CAErg=HEC=YL-wWEygqtmivN0axZ_cddkM-WDc8RA+jVTJYmVgQ@mail.gmail.com> <0d7afa83-a9d7-f977-ca36-533fc13b720e@eff.org> <CAErg=HF2WnSYtxs6r_svx-zCmt8ApkVsg6R7cezaYO=3WoVKQA@mail.gmail.com> <7129a939-35f1-f55b-703b-9f39f6110520@eff.org> <CAErg=HESLRQU=vg3sOFhBoBas7bBmL-z4ZkeeXOLD+y60OU5NA@mail.gmail.com> <e3384bdd6e5f4529b3b1d8abf7b32b83@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <e2e8e857-51d6-5138-ab66-4f3f4cff1590@eff.org> <CAErg=HF3cDWyufLYPE8sUsNMZei-1yS1Tw1dvpMPC+u67HemQw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwiAncZeNF9C4n51OGOq0S-1pKy_MOVe5ke9g0zxpSF6cA@mail.gmail.com> <269e5cb2-41f9-2605-759c-2478d816e591@eff.org>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 10:39:40 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: oIIitglftvLMv4sa3Ht-vjM31mg
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwh5tnKV=fmyeGjOyNL_LAo5xi=WfUxmoNwOWQ+bP-UjKA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
Cc: Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>, Patrick Donahue <pat@cloudflare.com>, Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Peter Bowen <pzb@amzn.com>, "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>, Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c095680db6b5f054aee252a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/2v7OlILdy0VqavQzjqzOkPbTgFA>
Subject: Re: [Spasm] CAA erratum 4515
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 14:39:43 -0000

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org> wrote:

>
> ​You mean tree climbing or tree climbing on CNAME?
>
> If the second, I concur.
>
> Yep, we've been using "tree climbing" as shorthand for "tree climbing on
> CNAME."
>


​So at this point, does anyone object to the ​following course of action:

​* Amend the CABForum ​'clarification' ballot to state that CAs must
implement RFC 6844 as amended by erratum 4515

* Write new ID to accept the substantive change described in Erratum 4515

* Request publication as a new RFC

​Now whether we do this inside or outside the WG is for the chairs and AD
to consider. I don't think this is currently a WG item.​ But if we have
concurrence and there is no real dispute, that probably isn't such an issue.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email