IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spasm] CAA erratum 4515

Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com> Sun, 12 March 2017 23:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4F91293F3 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sleevi.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kA0ySUlOE1Xm for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 885C9126D74 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504B6A00400B for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:08:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sleevi.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; s=sleevi.com; bh=N90evqPlFmg8EWQU4mn7Yfmf300=; b= CV4ArdDufUvTdC7XoMRP8vUimp/tJ4hKq4/E5SXtIF1+5o18TbA3NtWh8clmnAjO bctVJfdpkkoPQBQQVuYPQgi0dzqsDqa13W441HepsMdqxkl3AK9CL8bUM69UCgVN xzm3ChGeOhMN/7zvRZkbG6vppr/w2sKXTe3u55LzEVM=
Received: from mail-lf0-f41.google.com (mail-lf0-f41.google.com [209.85.215.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ryan@sleevi.com) by homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D178A00012B for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:08:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-f41.google.com with SMTP id z15so35388171lfd.1 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:08:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mxAE9+sdL4EF5PWketLYSj5wqNX5Ig7/g9J+/0zpnlFcF0UttwaseOy+TssYW9oUk8b3gfNQ5ir5XVrQ==
X-Received: by 10.25.0.207 with SMTP id 198mr7854065lfa.134.1489360106304; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.193.197 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0d7afa83-a9d7-f977-ca36-533fc13b720e@eff.org>
References: <79cf5707-693e-abf0-9e35-5dcc94a3e877@eff.org> <CAErg=HFtk0EKASTpWwNVhcT4zk2+ei-KPv=cMYDQej2oGJi=rw@mail.gmail.com> <9c55abf5-b81b-d9cb-c88c-7ea5bc6390c8@eff.org> <CAErg=HGT7FyDKgm8cAUojhGDOzLUkn=bw1Xdghbqnxw-79zQiw@mail.gmail.com> <20170311201904.GQ7733@mournblade.imrryr.org> <fede5d8f9f2c43518d8a3c502c60558a@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <389a248f-37e4-9ff7-b330-b840e7c47931@eff.org> <CAErg=HEC=YL-wWEygqtmivN0axZ_cddkM-WDc8RA+jVTJYmVgQ@mail.gmail.com> <0d7afa83-a9d7-f977-ca36-533fc13b720e@eff.org>
From: Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:08:25 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAErg=HF2WnSYtxs6r_svx-zCmt8ApkVsg6R7cezaYO=3WoVKQA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAErg=HF2WnSYtxs6r_svx-zCmt8ApkVsg6R7cezaYO=3WoVKQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113c9f48144052054a90ac37"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/rGT3aDN0V6G5SztzusN-d1Z8PWY>
Cc: Patrick Donahue <pat@cloudflare.com>, Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org>, Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Peter Bowen <pzb@amzn.com>, "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>, Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Subject: Re: [Spasm] CAA erratum 4515
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 23:08:30 -0000

On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
wrote:
>
> Separately: since we now realize that customers can't override CDN policy
> by adding CAA records to their own zone, if a customer wants to set their
> own CAA policy, the records have to be present on the CNAME target. That
> is, the CDN would have to cooperate in adding that record. Because
> different customers would no doubt want to express different policies, the
> CDN would have to use a trampoline if they wanted to offer per-customer CAA
> settings. However, this is true in both tree-climbing and non-tree-climbing
> worlds. Do you agree?
>

That sounds correct

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email