Re: [lamps] CAA Semantics for S/MIME

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 18 May 2018 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E5212D95D for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 May 2018 10:45:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VU8milJn5cDG for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 May 2018 10:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x234.google.com (mail-ot0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F1E412D942 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 May 2018 10:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x234.google.com with SMTP id n1-v6so10037051otf.7 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 May 2018 10:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BI23+dH3oG4/yN3QbCxWaaokxe57eko5QBWK/tPVsgA=; b=Tij/JOg+fKCUH8wO4q4qZNwBxoAEg/33i7oXu4WZHEd6CPTOzgiGKGNRxgUiT45Uew WxMf+dyEzkNW1wjDmSNoSop6PkWyjFp6G/Fach16S2aWoSMe6GDS5oHsatkBv1ravWPj IZMzehI70gvN1nHOj+0NLW8aWrEjieKhCwpWbpKApAlzNqbHpDI2rnJZK13CUmErrb6d rcat0VNWm36OisJMJasdTpp6d/gPylCykrLzpP+IgiJ8fOcEPcUtIk17t7WqEMvbRcMb siO0YwFKtEZj9ka/5oXoRaYoibMYYuVZ7p2WjEqGTgUuJev8Ruh0zisVEjSd0TU8cGKu IK7Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BI23+dH3oG4/yN3QbCxWaaokxe57eko5QBWK/tPVsgA=; b=Fg5TbEZkZ7AILZ2iG7IqD/i2ZCnrS45tiouPeF000TOnAtkDHrHqNX6G1Q3vQydTna f71VaINQbqrC9aMEviC2AcnlHpMcyLChIAt7vDywl5MAU3a3yLgHtz4xTibnMQk2eLDC LgOVyC5xEeN6ZCvAHrKD0q/iSQkz/kxJK0nywBQv480/8Kmwd9Gh5pLtAWvuCFNHeIxU 4OJIAhfpN4cPoTsU5RiaPtYNBXoTmo5Tw8cO+ZsCrg07GW5tl+oSZE8sU+2DSNCQcuxP Hq2kv6++V+jILBGQ2suM711ZSwuTys1AOa3lgxI0+eVB8R/G5veit2J1OAQn5UzlIruL 7x1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwdeXvgDqPoZ+NNYBFLiO+eWTh3IO8E9Ury4v3LUsGBo9FVhfUag uvgN0hKRMwA2bRoX5nbBsUXfksQrYsJo4wi8DfPOTw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZq1yYb5QL2PmOdnt9hcbcAVRwfd0PQ4ya47JRhQ+PPw9iGA4vTna+P0phh0CtQYWXLHrH2/71VV4Z7hAqAdYTk=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1055:: with SMTP id o21-v6mr7447386oto.371.1526665547926; Fri, 18 May 2018 10:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.201.118.130 with HTTP; Fri, 18 May 2018 10:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPh8bk-dtfqcf35m=Jwyv7Mm2mrFXe8xgiEKfvj7_W8PB-=+_A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPh8bk-dtfqcf35m=Jwyv7Mm2mrFXe8xgiEKfvj7_W8PB-=+_A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 10:45:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPY__PZ=jeS6xjzhPZLhn3bf6Nkh=2oLTiNpSxTL5kEQQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wayne Thayer <wthayer@gmail.com>
Cc: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ace73f056c7e8587"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/6qJ2GofJiYkXBa2fBy2E00eqi6I>
Subject: Re: [lamps] CAA Semantics for S/MIME
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 17:45:50 -0000

I agree that this is out of the proposed charter. If the WG wants to add it
as a charter item now, that seems fine.

-Ekr


On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Wayne Thayer <wthayer@gmail.com> wrote:

> There is a vigorous discussion about CAA and S/MIME certificates happening
> over on the mozilla.dev.security.policy list [1]. It has been proposed that
> this issue could be addressed as part of rfc6844bis, but I'm reading the
> LAMPS recharter as being too narrow in scope to permit this. Does this work
> need to be deferred to a future LAMPS recharter?
>
> - Wayne
>
> [1] https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.
> policy/NIc2Nwa9Msg/RGx4A5HBBAAJ
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
>
>