IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-15: (with DISCUSS)

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Thu, 08 August 2019 04:50 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21491206EC; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 21:50:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ux_SVYNdKBwI; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 21:50:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taper.sei.cmu.edu (taper.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F5671200BA; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 21:50:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by taper.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x784objl030517; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 00:50:37 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 taper.sei.cmu.edu x784objl030517
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1565239837; bh=kyCT1c22d7uVLTyTxPEwPUdGs9cY9hSL3oZhxo5Wzik=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=LpBFK8JeH8TESTC+NKGJUzaXrY6treLsnYUeXVbFqfy3xK4ifu1NPLFCYuASOg9GR Tq/nDI46ux3N9wxolqwrn/ltV4dW2O4vlYirVqv+E8xIW954uIBONo+tMbV+HZeZVN tzIoStrHFui1a/+H2EWyes1i5KJokTrmQnYorN30=
Received: from CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cascade.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.248]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x784oYlo029218; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 00:50:34 -0400
Received: from MARCHAND.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.251]) by CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.248]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 00:50:34 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes@ietf.org>, "lamps-chairs@ietf.org" <lamps-chairs@ietf.org>, "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>, "housley@vigilsec.com" <housley@vigilsec.com>
Thread-Topic: Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-15: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Index: AQHVSchz8oL0fspzZEem3qSCsBcW26bws2CA
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 04:50:33 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B3400EB1@marchand>
References: <156481532800.6108.1633834009578124669.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156481532800.6108.1633834009578124669.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/9wxPP3wD0I8VFUOVzUnTcPVpTvM>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-15: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 04:50:48 -0000


> -----Original Message-----
> From: iesg [mailto:iesg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexey Melnikov via
> Datatracker
> Sent: Saturday, August 3, 2019 2:55 AM
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes@ietf.org; lamps-chairs@ietf.org;
> spasm@ietf.org; housley@vigilsec.com
> Subject: Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-15: (with
> DISCUSS)
> 
> Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-15: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
> paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> This is a fine document, but I have one quick question:
> 
> Values TBD1..TBD4 are not listed in the IANA Considerations section. Should
> they be?

I don't think so.  This document and draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shakes both need the same OIDs (but have no other dependence).  This latter draft is with the RFC Editor and does register these OIDs.  The current text, "[I-D.ietf-lamps-pkix-shake] [ EDNOTE: Update reference with the RFC when it is ready ]", was intended to guide the editor to replace TBD1-4 the OIDs when ietf-lamps-pkix-shake got published.  However, in re-reading the text now, the EDNOTE should actually read "Updated the TBD1-2 reference when the RFC is published".

Make sense?

Roman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email