IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Interest to standardize PKI REST APIs?

Tomas Gustavsson <tomas.gustavsson@primekey.com> Mon, 10 June 2019 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <tomas.gustavsson@primekey.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CEE212013E for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 08:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=primekey.com header.b=ID+u+AD4; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=primekey.com header.b=To4vowjI
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xDf97VWIKVmw for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 08:27:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.primekey.com (mail.primekey.com [84.55.121.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BDA6120116 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 08:27:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.primekey.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.primekey.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF5586AA0093 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:27:01 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=primekey.com; s=mail; t=1560180422; bh=vANE7LoFdaQkVF+rKvN7EI7/ef8UzsvSyDRnMZ3+85A=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ID+u+AD40fczdETHM2MBMd2yyHx6exS4vZj7H41GQ3FRlicg7MvcfrGRKzBG8n2YW cMRs9fnBhHmo88dNex/R02lwYUakOVRrgcb/JiRejTezFWK18doq7VuHHdz4yg7buB S7FN9VY7Yp9izeaxJXOPaM2t2wPdtoIxWUgqPdWc=
Received: from [10.11.0.3] (gatekeeper.primekey.se [84.55.121.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.primekey.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 818D06AA0092 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:27:01 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=primekey.com; s=mail; t=1560180421; bh=vANE7LoFdaQkVF+rKvN7EI7/ef8UzsvSyDRnMZ3+85A=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=To4vowjI+9r79/xVVKqXqG+cHOLFivUq5YuC7XIVhgvznNXMLnOEhPfh6ESO/JO8P yyOsAPJm3sI+U8EerLmZAlxzpiFtJtwU+I/bwgitin3xwiX6NRiE5AkkEzVkflbf5C ZJe33S/AulU0EqImCgg6d8F/3OkYBRXzJ8wLyiZU=
To: spasm@ietf.org
References: <AM0PR10MB24028210BCE560C64195A74EFE320@AM0PR10MB2402.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <AM0PR10MB2402B5BB06E4FB59A8ECB16BFE060@AM0PR10MB2402.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <AM0PR10MB2402C7C1AAA09EABF047F0CEFE1D0@AM0PR10MB2402.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <29FAEBF1-2D67-469F-BE78-AF58F78D055E@vigilsec.com> <BN7PR11MB2547D526E00CE7C5DDCDB3E9C91E0@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <17374.1559083024@localhost> <HE1PR0701MB24447D45A6A7461DEC49FE7B9B1F0@HE1PR0701MB2444.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <12129.1559329924@localhost> <7f83213b-2e63-57f5-5a1a-956d47b58683@primekey.com> <AM0PR10MB2402726EDDA7074FEDFF917DFE100@AM0PR10MB2402.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <6992.1559937612@localhost> <83b511c0-4047-9431-196b-9b4028ee726d@primekey.com> <E313E304-95EA-4EEF-B23D-E43F919593FF@akamai.com> <28f0bc85-fd3f-e811-baf6-220ed8564c58@primekey.com> <42C0B0A7-792A-4DBD-B984-15A30B5C0FD0@akamai.com> <aa3265eb-40af-6d7d-5b35-adb6f14649a7@primekey.com> <9E9CA336-DBCC-4625-86D2-44655AEB5721@akamai.com>
From: Tomas Gustavsson <tomas.gustavsson@primekey.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=tomas.gustavsson@primekey.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBEyuwwYBCAD31Jsxn1lf7rnFc7y3Ol+TE7pU7ohO78kMdoVrZdAMnU9W0P33GedbU+kF 8/RFq7HlXV8a91RkgtdcMAK8tSdtBKDGZCOJZm5qOZ/EHikY8k/7s1wgSQSF4hYSG/IABCCA W139joDFl4L3buWyk2lsYX1HDBpuXGDL5HFyu165T0ZVlt23T04xmAwpIHUViKUWw1QYnlRz s66Desn2WeP+X8/QlqF1zOTUXbgrThB1X/Oh2+wzP08HVoTQCzlrEMeb9x2k+oa8PtVdnflh nZKBtyyBkZxRoHG3tNKcaf7JLoadSXcSKSKvfApcsxpP2JpkQgIhLi3JWik/Z+RR2WD1ABEB AAG0MFRvbWFzIEd1c3RhdnNzb24gPHRvbWFzLmd1c3RhdnNzb25AcHJpbWVrZXkuY29tPokB NwQTAQgAIQUCWX8yTAIbIwULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRBibcSbAEP+QGAU CAC82dn8XCQ8Ei7gxQAdRSc2imaP/388i/ObDMYhNhg5j4gXs3tkfxuCvhwkzskUFgOtmaEy uz/gIiVjQIsjQrHh5tl9M0q2tqbDHJpWfE6/SkXPUmTqQ0VGyq1MmZ3/zg2jSoll74qBSfdH V7sWugRXeCBxfaPeYo8DdPCGi27yrdL8zb3xkJ3BxPcDGNdkLm+Yza+qAOrssCD7MSLN+6Sd ML5Xcmw6pgRPlQ0aCsM7scrwgBNb7KrwxaqBxqwcuqF0NMgNjeiEHi2Oj3HOZdYU4Blk2GFq 9zHuCzTWumgNOlfksZ9K3ZMJBn6KLPot5bVXIKdnHwWRzoKMDxkSZjM5uQENBEyuwwYBCADZ 98eCFQ64zKo1OKkUgEJHO1JdsiqRO1znu6KyaTcd2vXfOCGkFFVBL+vjzzyyYV7Sg1/AaG4r l9TKJCwvx8mUmTJkKQspTfOj6AY33bmfMB/8LBYj2BjtxXyMucPjNTJqbL2r1HeGPV2nwyof MAyo2qcYuiLs20Ob7U8vooOV3GDDKEkXtJYZzTEU6qabGsepGIvMu770OZwvm4akQiCGe5sQ 4+/UH1pMZQNi+/fGbONFx+TUVMM8EkXD6dQ5WoL+xPabPjqiUmR7EBvg0uocr70Ag93tWk1d 4RgFcicjwMFcPg4TZ8Y/3Y7Nmbyo14+4SMNfNPFLgQMawL+cLLkdABEBAAGJAR8EGAECAAkC GwwFAlYXhXUACgkQYm3EmwBD/kA2igf/QNpPe7sLt3KdRD3x4cStxGjLCWyj7x1YLVnV4Nnu TvaNhC+KHx3uG39y1x3PJQwslpeSQ6JipOUmxeQjjGJGQZLV41L1PCJVhCL98Dinr6dJkYB7 cAVhfmW8PI51jiANExLZu8U5gnthj5CGv4428ODQgSoRI0demG3HmVCNrKdap+orhT8zRkq8 DuHTO01U7PKsfvQ2k8AqSAC/JjMOs1mpFe032IApXxlZkE+33Q3dE5BiJmICYg8hsRXvpKTm ZMCdNZJUQLq+XNpg6RtAPQIPMmCepXrE9M/KuH+jFS2G5+Hx5VBSM644E1G2i+HOPCVdHjof iaNi3V/ItEG3jw==
Message-ID: <ba2d88d1-4db7-ff38-3caf-816184efaa4b@primekey.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:27:04 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9E9CA336-DBCC-4625-86D2-44655AEB5721@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/CZKKibiNDfsY5pQC5GVJrvnZqPU>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Interest to standardize PKI REST APIs?
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:27:10 -0000

Thanks. Lots of interesting reading there. I was aware of some of the
new validation methods for webPKI (like CAA), but not this for example.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moriarty-acme-client

Seems like there is indeed some good work done. I'll continue monitoring
that.

Cheers,
Tomas

On 2019-06-10 17:03, Salz, Rich wrote:
>     Are there any examples of such additions to the base spec publicly
>     available?
> 
> Many.  Look at https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/acme/documents/ to see the document list; the "authority token" is for phones, the rest should be obvious.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email