IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-04

"Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com> Tue, 18 December 2018 21:57 UTC

Return-Path: <pkampana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80CD5129BBF for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:57:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.565
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.565 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xOLOEgIiKLsp for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:57:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 729E212D84D for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:57:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3166; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1545170275; x=1546379875; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=DW8175Q6SyiU4t8Iumqlj6niXcP6Rr6D1doBCMwZMYA=; b=i05ZNhNYzoNCSC6sWhfX1r/LEfWSu6FtC20Ghol6GxbsL2f31fe+iGI7 uDcA0RgWMQlBWAIwocHh4rnkZCwF2/klqzAsB2Dr/SsvqmfMMZl0e7PFR d0/6r7J+YCYwQKkDZVS5qiLNTIpxzGpqoE/52kje3vRw//qxnAopt4yiJ M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ADAAADbBlc/4kNJK1jGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBgVopZoECJwqDc4gZi3uCDYNFlBWBewsBARgLhEkCF4JEIjQJDQEDAQECAQECbRwMhTwBAQEDAQEBGwYROhAHBAIBCBEEAQEBAgImAgICJQsVCAgCBAESCIMbgXgID6cVgS+EQUCFKAWBC4s0F4FAP4ERgxKDHgEBAwGBdIJxglcCoSQJAocNikkggV2FH4ktgS6Idk6BBYNyiGKCLwIRFIEnHziBVnAVO4JsgiYYfwEJh1WFP0ExjBoHgSeBHwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,370,1539648000"; d="scan'208";a="214453379"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Dec 2018 21:46:25 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-009.cisco.com (xch-aln-009.cisco.com [173.36.7.19]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wBILkP4v024296 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 18 Dec 2018 21:46:25 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-010.cisco.com (173.36.7.20) by XCH-ALN-009.cisco.com (173.36.7.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 15:46:24 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-010.cisco.com ([173.36.7.20]) by XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com ([173.36.7.20]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 15:46:24 -0600
From: "Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-04
Thread-Index: AQHUiP230ab3ITdSO0aTgSs7szrA5qWDnfmAgAAa9oCAAWmqcA==
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 21:46:24 +0000
Message-ID: <e5ac161a383045e2a69a4268ce4453d6@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com>
References: <9762B229-9944-4EA5-A453-4529B97FD5E6@vigilsec.com> <956F1492-3569-4427-90E0-738FA10966DD@vigilsec.com> <F7378AF0-CA2E-40AE-93E7-28381AA77948@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <F7378AF0-CA2E-40AE-93E7-28381AA77948@vigilsec.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.243.210]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.19, xch-aln-009.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/Jy1-ETjAzIgIDFEmbm9UDd5YNUw>
Subject: Re: [lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-04
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 21:57:59 -0000

Thanks Russ, I just posted -05 that address all 3. 
It also adds a blurb under the acknowledgements to acknowledge your help with this. 
Panos


-----Original Message-----
From: Spasm <spasm-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Russ Housley
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 1:06 PM
To: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-04

I observed three problems when working on the shepherd write-up.

(1) I observed that three informative references are missing:

  == Missing Reference: 'RFC5753' is mentioned on line 524

  == Missing Reference: 'RFC6268' is mentioned on line 612

  == Missing Reference: 'RFC5911' is mentioned on line 619

These are all part of comments in the ASN.1 module.

(2) The ASN.1 module calls for the assignment of a module identifier by IANA.  The IANA considerations need to ask IANA to assign this value.

I suggest this text:

   One object identifier for the ASN.1 module in Appendix A was
   assigned in the SMI Security for S/MIME Module Identifiers
   (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.0) registry:

   CMSAlgsForSHAKE-2018 { { iso(1) member-body(2) us(840)
        rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs-9(9) smime(16) modules(0)
        id-mod-cms-shakes(TBD) }

(3) The ASN.1 module does not compile.  I will send corrections.

Can the authors quickly update the document?

Russ


> On Dec 17, 2018, at 11:29 AM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> With no one raising any concerns, it seems that we have reached consensus on this document.
> 
> I will begin the shepherd write-up, and once that is posted in the datatracker, I will ask the IESG to publish the document.
> 
> Russ
> 
> 
>> On Nov 30, 2018, at 5:40 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>> 
>> This is the LAMPS WG Last Call for "Use of the SHAKE One-way Hash Functions in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)” <draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-04>.  Please review the document and send your comments to the list by 15 December 2018.
>> 
>> The datatracker page for the document is https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes/
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Russ & Tim
> 

_______________________________________________
Spasm mailing list
Spasm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email