Re: [lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-04

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 17 December 2018 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8091271FF for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 08:29:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Zmzxo6bIyHk for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 08:29:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9B72130EB8 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 08:29:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF95300595 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 11:29:31 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id jxgynMRjj8ZW for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 11:29:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.1.161] (pool-108-45-137-105.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.137.105]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F150300081 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 11:29:30 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 11:29:31 -0500
References: <9762B229-9944-4EA5-A453-4529B97FD5E6@vigilsec.com>
To: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <9762B229-9944-4EA5-A453-4529B97FD5E6@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <956F1492-3569-4427-90E0-738FA10966DD@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/g-osjMEfA5MMvTpIEJeEpMWQlMU>
Subject: Re: [lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-04
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 16:29:36 -0000

With no one raising any concerns, it seems that we have reached consensus on this document.

I will begin the shepherd write-up, and once that is posted in the datatracker, I will ask the IESG to publish the document.

Russ


> On Nov 30, 2018, at 5:40 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> This is the LAMPS WG Last Call for "Use of the SHAKE One-way Hash Functions in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)” <draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-04>.  Please review the document and send your comments to the list by 15 December 2018.
> 
> The datatracker page for the document is https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes/
> 
> Thanks,
> Russ & Tim