IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Seeking guidance on proceeding with question from IETF-104 presentation on lightweight CMP profile

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 02 April 2019 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343B3120220 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 08:37:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.852
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, KHOP_DYNAMIC=0.85, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tpbr4wrBXVDh for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 08:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 648201201D0 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 08:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x32FScL3017007; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:37:27 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=J7b5En8WCZW0MTBm+rBHqIG2wYSeFZ3ayZ/GJT+0O1c=; b=nZ7pBXnWdUCqJo5aTid9+NcLwfYRKiowcrsHxE9HXnnXp0haGPSfhDndQI37D6LVNxa1 PH49+HIUaSmzWizoy9k0wfrBIVU9F//7+4IxbmE0Y303nVYYvfM9rLtnrAUVyGQoJW4E GFbe8405pr6jXoVebP+uWSzRmpsdLsA8VtapUWgAWYqjuSulmMbikwG04dM0Izjx9bY4 I+edDI6uewrkyoCm0x5mwNuGIWEsln8V6MPwlWQ1ynQ6n00EOeEOli/m8BPu1+hfElpb SGJBAXuoDxTREC/SM3I4xyol6sfyrDkXQdujlLZpATWZBZLgwGyygwg5j3HbO1JbkdRl mw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2rm67q111b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 02 Apr 2019 16:37:26 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x32FXBDF030428; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 11:37:25 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.25.33]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2rj3svn156-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 02 Apr 2019 11:37:25 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.101) by ustx2ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 08:37:22 -0700
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.003; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:37:22 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "Fries, Steffen" <steffen.fries@siemens.com>, "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lamps] Seeking guidance on proceeding with question from IETF-104 presentation on lightweight CMP profile
Thread-Index: AQHU6Wn2Dvygrx2LZEKIw/hN3uQcBg==
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 15:37:21 +0000
Message-ID: <CC5ADDEC-B801-4709-B337-7A0AB4C770CB@akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.17.1.190326
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.37.16]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B4818AF1FD5FC0438480951F1821CB43@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-04-02_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=423 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904020104
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-04-02_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=456 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904020104
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/JyqzKYHhWarAV0IXRKMMDSDL4xQ>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Seeking guidance on proceeding with question from IETF-104 presentation on lightweight CMP profile
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 15:37:39 -0000

If everything you need was possible by just "trimming down" CMP then it seems to me that an individual/informative RFC is appropriate. But as you have to change things, however, it makes more sense to go for WG/standards-track RFC. It could still be published as independent stream experimental.

There seems to be interest from other WG's in this, so I'd go for the middle route.

v2.8.10 | Report a Bug | By Email