Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (6129)
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Fri, 24 April 2020 23:43 UTC
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525853A0F83 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 16:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9eTZymeb8cTp for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 16:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D96E23A085E for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 16:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 03ONh8fZ007497 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 24 Apr 2020 19:43:11 -0400
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 16:43:07 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: housley@vigilsec.com, rdd@cert.org, tim.hollebeek@digicert.com, beccasanderson25@gmail.com, spasm@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200424234307.GA27494@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <20200424233725.E1502F4070B@rfc-editor.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200424233725.E1502F4070B@rfc-editor.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/K08x4UZloCHg85vQszxr4qSs0-o>
Subject: Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (6129)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 23:43:21 -0000
RFC Editor, please delete this empty report. Thanks, Ben On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 04:37:25PM -0700, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8649, > "Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6129 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Becca Sanderson X <beccasanderson25@gmail.com> > > Section: RFC2119 > > Original Text > ------------- > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > > > Notes > ----- > > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8649 (draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-07) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension > Publication Date : August 2019 > Author(s) : R. Housley > Category : INFORMATIONAL > Source : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG
- [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (6129) RFC Errata System
- Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (… Megan Ferguson