[lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (6129)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 24 April 2020 23:37 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 180233A0F58 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 16:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5YSsVYDQgYNv for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 16:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06FD43A0F49 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 16:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E1502F4070B; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 16:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
To: housley@vigilsec.com, rdd@cert.org, kaduk@mit.edu, housley@vigilsec.com, tim.hollebeek@digicert.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: beccasanderson25@gmail.com, spasm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20200424233725.E1502F4070B@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 16:37:25 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/VsR6eQoMaLcEliVJhSUlFy1m1G4>
Subject: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (6129)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 23:37:36 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8649, "Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6129 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Becca Sanderson X <beccasanderson25@gmail.com> Section: RFC2119 Original Text ------------- Corrected Text -------------- Notes ----- Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8649 (draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-07) -------------------------------------- Title : Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension Publication Date : August 2019 Author(s) : R. Housley Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (6129) RFC Errata System
- Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (… Megan Ferguson