IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spasm] Suggestions for draft-schaad-rfc5751-bis-00.txt

Laetitia Baudoin <lbaudoin@google.com> Mon, 02 May 2016 18:44 UTC

Return-Path: <lbaudoin@google.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD0612D10C for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 May 2016 11:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mL-OvOK9YO0S for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 May 2016 11:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22a.google.com (mail-vk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE6E912D5B6 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 May 2016 11:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id b189so6307718vkh.2 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 May 2016 11:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ey8TtkeO2ZeKvtxem19PN5Zme5H6sUdH9xXKFF7nOvo=; b=mL4e/4D1stLSNVcOS4bmVLxb1WHiyPpyPUadDzEXkrwC1IeYUJUig30rdowNYGA1S7 0bXTyquDmpW7sh5FLAOmbvWB15OY1JZp5Tx7eIG8d+/FAmE226GX291EQWNGEW9+SoUs tIxqbsjQwj3vDxf9ObzsOUmolQmBFcQ0I/kQLsRFeO3Xah/IEkcjKBs/1LMQc7Tr6W+t GABnFTXMuIKnQb1ceY1GtReewQO2SdsXL93IYFZIxNJMwqN9TIt3LBmAPI/LAIgmWr7G uuMF5MDxXWQbZnaS0HaF51hUiBhucoVZk87l7WgxhTVHiATRh9TlYjRG4mR00XRCD1t2 tuNA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ey8TtkeO2ZeKvtxem19PN5Zme5H6sUdH9xXKFF7nOvo=; b=buJQY26E+DmcYccDoBzzbt57UrtpzbTbRc3SlvMfiGJkOuVMf362XKmDQzixcxeHRz z+YtpAu90RziRRD5ck4Ng9FeBfYx5VzQ8QXNvHyaI94fVKoYl5oBEHgD13VUT9INM7LY TZ45wrFkEy9e0N5eXGHQ5eZ13N3HrYaVcbHdCNS0LcBdhr9g4O8RWlwq5azQpdhC+SWp geE9iO30qhW8qstr8bfGX7SEIY/0e5iCk76s6mVpoRd80N9dcYAZQc/Ff9uHwaKp9gsP M1cQWNkzVoZSMVarlbQom8hvOYYiya3Ij77mYaaQRq0ymKVjD3bArw7H+X8eJZdKPquy yeFg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUuLePCEs7CK2nps0P09YJTED0AEq/eolSEOdYQ0sxxU/uOU5tRCc7G4fuYVwArS0vbiVmG7PNXbAbmEMuy
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.176.1.79 with SMTP id 73mr20878839uak.123.1462214664923; Mon, 02 May 2016 11:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.31.108.84 with HTTP; Mon, 2 May 2016 11:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E05C2E4F-07E3-4225-BC39-43013E776906@vigilsec.com>
References: <CAFTDvC5g5CeY0V4xO3NahYc226BMOF5QCCK41_admqiz88ZZ3Q@mail.gmail.com> <0afb01d1a355$d064a720$712df560$@augustcellars.com> <CAFTDvC51e2ku8f1P+9=U7de792vzYcaL0YrbRgEbM3k3eNf6ag@mail.gmail.com> <E05C2E4F-07E3-4225-BC39-43013E776906@vigilsec.com>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 11:44:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFTDvC7_8C0th0kVvyoNpDnvPhUd0T37M_-o_3R=HzChCVTZ4Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Laetitia Baudoin <lbaudoin@google.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/LSV0-aZWL-Z3pMb4xBByP2hAwu8>
Cc: spasm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Spasm] Suggestions for draft-schaad-rfc5751-bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 18:44:29 -0000

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> Laetitia:
>
>> Jim, we agree that authenticated encryption doesn't provide
>> authentication. My point was that the reason given in the draft is
>> misleading.
>
> Isn’t this as simple as saying that confidentiality and integrity are provided when auth-enveloped-data is employed?
Agreed, it would be a better wording.

>
> Russ
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email