IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] FW: New Version Notification for draft-vangeest-x509-hash-sigs-00.txt

Daniel Van Geest <Daniel.VanGeest@isara.com> Sun, 14 October 2018 02:20 UTC

Return-Path: <Daniel.VanGeest@isara.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D546F128CFD for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 19:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7PI5ldUTKf1O for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 19:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esa1.isaracorp.com (esa1.isaracorp.com [207.107.152.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48BD2128766 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 19:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown (HELO V0501WEXGPR02.isaracorp.com) ([10.5.9.20]) by ip1.isaracorp.com with ESMTP; 14 Oct 2018 02:19:53 +0000
Received: from V0501WEXGPR01.isaracorp.com (10.5.8.20) by V0501WEXGPR01.isaracorp.com (10.5.8.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.1466.3; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 22:19:52 -0400
Received: from V0501WEXGPR01.isaracorp.com ([fe80::d802:5aec:db34:beba]) by V0501WEXGPR01.isaracorp.com ([fe80::d802:5aec:db34:beba%7]) with mapi id 15.01.1466.003; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 22:19:52 -0400
From: Daniel Van Geest <Daniel.VanGeest@isara.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
CC: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lamps] FW: New Version Notification for draft-vangeest-x509-hash-sigs-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHUYMUHdpxjfrA1dEW3V6hKK1/0vaUZLkUAgAAAV4CAAODWAIAAazsAgAPxJQA=
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 02:19:52 +0000
Message-ID: <10EE4875-A684-4396-BCF8-AC2C79275CC4@isara.com>
References: <153919524373.5861.7228296681722124369.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F16925E1-F8F1-4069-BF5A-91CBCF98C7C9@isara.com> <8B931581-1CCD-4C3B-841D-8C78531EDFA7@vigilsec.com> <97CFF9D6-F445-4FD4-A0FF-4296F580C5DF@isara.com> <1333B758-3C46-414D-9EB5-F2BB615D4ED5@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <1333B758-3C46-414D-9EB5-F2BB615D4ED5@vigilsec.com>
Accept-Language: en-CA, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.31.5.52]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_10EE4875A6844396BCF8AC2C79275CC4isaracom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/NEjmXIGjke2gBTh1UZeQskBTTkY>
Subject: Re: [lamps] FW: New Version Notification for draft-vangeest-x509-hash-sigs-00.txt
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 02:20:02 -0000


On 2018-10-11, 12:08 PM, "Russ Housley" <housley@vigilsec.com<mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>> wrote:


sa-HSS-LMS-HashSig-with-SHA256 as defined above is the same as sa-HSS-LMS-HashSig in my draft.  We need to use one or the other.

Right.  Well since this draft proposes a SHA-512 variant, I think the SHA-256 variant should have SHA256 in the name (using a similarly-named OID).  It would be cleanest if the OIDs were all defined in the same document and other docs reference the one, but am not opposed if there are reasons for doing it otherwise.  That’s something to determine if this gets added to the charter.

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email