Re: [lamps] [IANA #1261900] expert review for draft-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile (cmp)

[John Gray <[e-mail]>]

First time as a reviewer, I guess I'm supposed to say if it is approved, denied or needs more information.

I will say "denied".   I believe I found a small issue which I reported below, so if that is confirmed and corrected, then I will switch to "approved".

Cheers,

John Gray


-----Original Message-----
From: John Gray
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2023 11:46 AM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Brockhaus, Hendrik <[e-mail]>; David von Oheimb <[e-mail]>; Steffen Fries <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [IANA #1261900] expert review for draft-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile (cmp)

I have reviewed the document for the Well-Known URI Path Segments for this document:   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile/.   I think there is an issue in section 6.1 that looks like a copy/paste type of error:

Snippet from table 1 in section 6.1 (page 79):

+----------------------------+--------------------+---------+
   | Get CA Certificates        |     getcacerts     | Section |
   |                            |                    | 4.3.1   |
   +----------------------------+--------------------+---------+
   | Get Root CA Certificate    |   getrootupdate    | Section |
   | Update                     |                    | 4.3.2   |
   +----------------------------+--------------------+---------+
   | Get CA Certificates        | getcertreqtemplate | Section |
   |                            |                    | 4.3.1   |
   +----------------------------+--------------------+---------+
   | CRL Update Retrieval       |      getcrls       | Section |
   |                            |                    | 4.3.4   |
   +----------------------------+--------------------+---------+

The "Get CA Certificates" PKI Management Operation is listed twice.   The second time it refers to the same section 4.3.1.   The path Segment says "getcertreqtemplate".    I compared it to the CoAP Transfer from table 2 in section 6.2, and section 6.2 seems correct and it contains a PKI Management Operation of "Get Certificate Request Template" which is what I think was meant in section 6.1.

From Table 2 section 6.2 (page 82) - Notice no duplicate and reference to 4.3.3
+---------------------------------------+---------+---------+
   | Get CA Certificates                   |   crts  | Section |
   |                                       |         | 4.3.1   |
   +---------------------------------------+---------+---------+
   | Get Root CA Certificate Update        |   rcu   | Section |
   |                                       |         | 4.3.2   |
   +---------------------------------------+---------+---------+
   | Get Certificate Request Template      |   att   | Section |
   |                                       |         | 4.3.3   |
   +---------------------------------------+---------+---------+
   | CRL Update Retrieval                  |   crls  | Section |
   |                                       |         | 4.3.4   |
   +---------------------------------------+---------+---------+


So I think section 6.1 needs to be updated as follows:

+----------------------------+--------------------+---------+
   | Get CA Certificates        |     getcacerts     | Section |
   |                            |                    | 4.3.1   |
   +----------------------------+--------------------+---------+
   | Get Root CA Certificate    |   getrootupdate    | Section |
   | Update                     |                    | 4.3.2   |
   +----------------------------+--------------------+---------+
   | Get Certificate Request Template        | getcertreqtemplate | Section |
   |                            |                    | 4.3.3   |
   +----------------------------+--------------------+---------+
   | CRL Update Retrieval       |      getcrls       | Section |
   |                            |                    | 4.3.4   |
   +----------------------------+--------------------+---------+

The rest of it looks correct to me.


Is this all I need to do for this review, or is there something more official needed?


Cheers,

John Gray

-----Original Message-----
From: John Gray
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2023 4:29 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [IANA #1261900] expert review for draft-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile (cmp)

Hi Sabrina,

Its on my list of items to complete.  I know January 12th (tomorrow) is the deadline.   I've just been in meetings all day so this is a task I'm hoping to complete by tomorrow.

Thanks for pinging me about it...   😊

John Gray


-----Original Message-----
From: Sabrina Tanamal via RT <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2023 4:26 PM
Cc: John Gray <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [IANA #1261900] expert review for draft-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile (cmp)

WARNING: This email originated outside of Entrust.
DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe.

______________________________________________________________________
Hi John (cc: lamps wg),

Have you had a chance to review this request?

Thanks,

Sabrina Tanamal
Lead IANA Services Specialist

On Fri Dec 30 00:50:09 2022, sabrina.tanamal wrote:
> Dear John (cc: lamps wg),
>
> As the designated expert for the CMP Well-Known URI Path Segments
> registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-
> lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile for us? Please see
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iet
> f-lamps-lightweight-cmp-__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!YtpBnAjGOOsCPP5j6YbYViNYTYry
> HrTqrfOTBYNCw2PXGvz8_A9IxOZWYMyJxbES1-lNecAAd0NIY-btTtQ0T0xTPrc$
> profile/
>
> The due date is January 12th.
>
> If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication,
> we'll make the registration at
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.iana.org/assignments/cmp__;!!F
> J-Y8qCqXTj2!YtpBnAjGOOsCPP5j6YbYViNYTYryHrTqrfOTBYNCw2PXGvz8_A9IxOZWYM
> yJxbES1-lNecAAd0NIY-btTtQ05lM5cLo$
>
> Hendrik Brockhaus and David von Oheimb are also experts for this
> registry, but they're the authors of this document.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Sabrina Tanamal
> Lead IANA Services Specialist

Any email and files/attachments transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If this message has been sent to you in error, you must not copy, distribute or disclose of the information it contains. Please notify Entrust immediately and delete the message from your system.