[lamps] Martin Duke's Yes on draft-ietf-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance-15: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 05 March 2024 21:11 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance@ietf.org, lamps-chairs@ietf.org, spasm@ietf.org, housley@vigilsec.com, housley@vigilsec.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <170967311991.24872.5143269839183143624@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 13:11:59 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/PtjExxQYNDn3JvFPDHCthMSMm74>
Subject: [lamps] Martin Duke's Yes on draft-ietf-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance-15: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance-15: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for this document.

Would it be worthwhile to discuss the handling of encrypted email with obsolete
ciphers, as is done in (6.4) for signatures?

[lamps] Martin Duke's Yes on draft-ietf-lamps-e2e… Martin Duke via Datatracker
Re: [lamps] Martin Duke's Yes on draft-ietf-lamps… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Re: [lamps] Martin Duke's Yes on draft-ietf-lamps… Martin Duke