IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs-08.txt

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 05 March 2024 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34054C14F69E for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:56:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=vigilsec.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bEFuylaCxirU for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:55:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25BCBC14F5E9 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:55:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218BD1033BD; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 14:55:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (pfs.iad.rg.net [198.180.150.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE8B2102DBB; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 14:55:56 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CCD10730-1415-4290-AA10-5CEF918B07BF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <1844.1709664966@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 14:55:46 -0500
Cc: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <333A2B99-2B42-43F5-A21C-5EF00DE6EDCA@vigilsec.com>
References: <170951366354.6144.9138649357211538117@ietfa.amsl.com> <77BEC813-D6E7-428B-AAA8-0E4358EC80CE@vigilsec.com> <0ACAE3E9-2821-4E6A-A366-1FACDC1AA243@vigilsec.com> <10603.1709575504@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <EE3AB825-C8A3-40D9-9755-E5536C7EC4C4@vigilsec.com> <1844.1709664966@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vigilsec.com; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=pair-202402141609; bh=3WYeYx/xH0pH0ipncKFTq+39JjjwjDdWlT0WKvLbN0E=; b=e1/EytJ077ZDE04qE4KMaE73VPE9A0aleJGXGOZQ1l/xkQytm9q3XUq5w/XgcHJQyp4hvTSpb34gx7p/DBwV9xuF49FNeA7WmXjj1YPeevuSqCLIw7FOvY7j4GDJKQDn/MBLRH16Eg2xQqxQWdZ8GnOQy6jRYE6OrFDo6j85MFhsz0VPEj0gPUnPI9bhYrWjC1QWaJZ94o7KiUpaEI2skEGSP//nohD/NEPGAPMbiT5BTfOrYqAgdruXNKrCcjY6A9ajT4/jVAoj//JzOyrQmVNOW/juzO9Im/gCdTFARr4+n5wRGEHYFhNFQN2BT3908RJCcEJw2oMxJglLhMYFDA==
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.11 on 66.39.134.11
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/guY6q95sxEptNdRGCPEuxdhezPk>
Subject: Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs-08.txt
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: This is the mail list for the LAMPS Working Group <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 19:56:02 -0000


> On Mar 5, 2024, at 1:56 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
> Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>> sourcecode-markers="true" is the thing that adds the <CODE BEGINS> and
>> <CODE ENDS>.  The blocks of base64 example output are not source code.
> 
> So I figured out that I was editing the wrong part of the kramdown :-)
> I remove all the CODE BEGINS from the Base64 encoded things, and they look a
> bit weird naked like that.
> 
> I wonder if we should have a guideline for PKIX documents that include ASN.1
> blobs, and need to show it in a variety of forms.  I think we all kinda do
> the same thing, but maybe we should normalize it.
> 
> I read through the document, I found a typo:
> "big string" should be "bit stream" in 3.3.
> 
> Other than that, and the CODE BEGINS issue, yeah, it's ready for reviews and
> publication.  I'm sorry this has dragged on forever.

In the past I have just used:

>
~~~
[[[Base64 blob]]]
~~~

This puts an indent in the txt version.

This puts a box around it in the html version.

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email