Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs-08.txt

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 04 March 2024 18:45 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92A6C17C8B6 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 10:45:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=vigilsec.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4X9XYR28q_DL for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 10:45:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA436C17C8A9 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 10:45:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5B4174121; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 13:45:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (pfs.iad.rg.net [198.180.150.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD394174042; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 13:45:21 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <10603.1709575504@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 13:45:10 -0500
Cc: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EE3AB825-C8A3-40D9-9755-E5536C7EC4C4@vigilsec.com>
References: <170951366354.6144.9138649357211538117@ietfa.amsl.com> <77BEC813-D6E7-428B-AAA8-0E4358EC80CE@vigilsec.com> <0ACAE3E9-2821-4E6A-A366-1FACDC1AA243@vigilsec.com> <10603.1709575504@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vigilsec.com; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=pair-202402141609; bh=8ReVSuf9NweFpPNuUgrFup/pS6zNUiddSmMc6jxefHw=; b=Diil8EPB9MYkNhzkcHCeKgLW1sqd8nAJjdmMwi8QeZrZkYwGM5vE+HfVmttEDsZQCZpsPqDHYApHFjuBjKsgSbqBpbvJ8Wv7fQR7C3KzXzRhulJhDuts7CGlxODn8/RRVmd8AKeCHaw5QF41B6NHUAQza2O28sviUFsw2bfZZBRW8S+0WJk/Qa2O/DLS6E339RcKFS1aqZGtEO9EgGw9FK0tpWkTliruQMTr18VlM0XTGzg7whNNtnezSa/xd4m7FDBVsIErrQBo4sDl2irVJvpY2AivpT7oRix0SkzOWRufgdXZinIXIW+9bpnIgWCWJW+IB5JxTCzGImEVU8RLjA==
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.11 on 66.39.134.11
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/h7k9JV8PTstD4_lSdYYYEquYuSk>
Subject: Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs-08.txt
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: This is the mail list for the LAMPS Working Group <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 18:45:26 -0000

Michael:

> Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>> After a quick skim of the new document, it appears to me that Section
>> 5.6.1 should not be using <CODE BEGINS> and <CODE ENDS>.
> 
> I'm not sure what to think.
> My kramdown says:
> 
> ~~~~ base64
> {::include examples/realistic-acp.csrattr.b64}
> ~~~~
> {: sourcecode-markers="true" sourcecode-name="realistic-acp.csrattr”}
> 
> And I note that my filename was note included in the CODE BEGINS.
> Well. I tried some things, but it didn't work, so I'm gonna leave this as an
> issue to fix.
> 

sourcecode-markers="true"  is the thing that adds the <CODE BEGINS> and <CODE ENDS>.  The blocks of base64 example output are not source code.

Russ