IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce-01

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 15 May 2020 13:10 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454543A09C1 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 May 2020 06:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uvC-bqjaERQp for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 May 2020 06:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 160BF3A0976 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 May 2020 06:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5261E300B50 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 May 2020 09:10:02 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 65IbezTMMpuX for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 May 2020 09:09:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-72-66-113-56.washdc.fios.verizon.net [72.66.113.56]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA5F6300A31; Fri, 15 May 2020 09:09:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <BA4BBC5F-6BAF-4DC2-BFEE-A37C41CFD555@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6D3669B6-6994-40ED-B19A-888045345B7F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 09:09:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAEpwuw27as_neX+SwhMDs5CSe5vYVjSdmFxxgJCsmjytEGvdgw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
To: Mohit Sahni <mohit06jan@gmail.com>
References: <31FF8CDA-9A6B-4C16-ABD0-800E06325748@vigilsec.com> <89A15B08-A362-4240-B2E7-677343AF5AFB@vigilsec.com> <CAEpwuw3YA3Bss5YEbGZ+1JMAb2j5ufXtHArM0uyeQ28FAWpqjg@mail.gmail.com> <CAEpwuw27as_neX+SwhMDs5CSe5vYVjSdmFxxgJCsmjytEGvdgw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/QEN-o-c-lV1Nj-Cb431E89AvaO8>
Subject: Re: [lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce-01
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 13:10:07 -0000

Thanks.  

> On May 15, 2020, at 3:42 AM, Mohit Sahni <mohit06jan@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Russ,
> I have submitted the draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce-02.txt after making changes suggested by you. It can be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce/> . 
> 
> Thanks
> Mohit 
> 
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 4:59 PM Mohit Sahni <mohit06jan@gmail.com <mailto:mohit06jan@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Thanks Russ I will update the draft with this information. 
> 
> 
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 3:46 PM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com <mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>> wrote:
> A few things need to be changed based on the detailed review that I did for the shepherd writeup.
> 
> 1) The upper left of the title page needed to include "Updates: 6960 (if approved)"
> 
> 2) I do not think that reference [1] is needed.  I do not find it harmful, but IDnits thinks it is a normative reference, and of course, it is not.
> 
> 3) The IANA Considerations should say: "This document does not call for any IANA actions."
> 
> Russ
> 
> > On Apr 27, 2020, at 10:56 AM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com <mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>> wrote:
> > 
> > This is the LAMPS WG Last Call for "OCSP Nonce Extension” <draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce-01>.  Please review the document and send your comments to the list by 12 May 2020.
> > 
> > The datatracker page for the document is https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce/>
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Russ & Tim
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org <mailto:Spasm@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email