Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8702 (7288)
"Kampanakis, Panos" <kpanos@amazon.com> Wed, 28 December 2022 14:59 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=354ed788e=kpanos@amazon.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDBDC14CF01 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 06:59:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazon.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JGPIbW951q0m for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 06:59:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-fw-6002.amazon.com (smtp-fw-6002.amazon.com [52.95.49.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF121C1522C2 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 06:59:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amazon.com; i=@amazon.com; q=dns/txt; s=amazon201209; t=1672239568; x=1703775568; h=from:to:cc:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject; bh=hKYA0IMvRzmVKyuJl6ZkTuSwEts+XZmYduM01YpnWRE=; b=qbhePLDSlP+4F6/+LQze3pMIn9yfImc/ywvH2Im1UAYN4kqaWGJwyUY4 CbZGRRVE4gz1o43s0ohwSJsxBriheFk/ylDEXY/+9DrTN6IwJgPMpDlHJ beMnJedzg9138IVo3SwI0TwzS2sgDtYzISmnbAAm5bLHg8nzKu9a4KGLO 4=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,281,1665446400"; d="scan'208";a="281486334"
Thread-Topic: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8702 (7288)
Received: from iad12-co-svc-p1-lb1-vlan3.amazon.com (HELO email-inbound-relay-iad-1d-m6i4x-e651a362.us-east-1.amazon.com) ([10.43.8.6]) by smtp-border-fw-6002.iad6.amazon.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Dec 2022 14:59:25 +0000
Received: from EX13MTAUWB001.ant.amazon.com (iad12-ws-svc-p26-lb9-vlan3.iad.amazon.com [10.40.163.38]) by email-inbound-relay-iad-1d-m6i4x-e651a362.us-east-1.amazon.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E37D83301; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 14:59:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from EX19D001ANA003.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.188) by EX13MTAUWB001.ant.amazon.com (10.43.161.249) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.42; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 14:59:20 +0000
Received: from EX19D001ANA001.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.156) by EX19D001ANA003.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.188) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.2.1118.20; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 14:59:19 +0000
Received: from EX19D001ANA001.ant.amazon.com ([fe80::4f78:75cd:3117:8055]) by EX19D001ANA001.ant.amazon.com ([fe80::4f78:75cd:3117:8055%5]) with mapi id 15.02.1118.020; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 14:59:19 +0000
From: "Kampanakis, Panos" <kpanos@amazon.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "quynh.dang@nist.gov" <quynh.dang@nist.gov>, "rdd@cert.org" <rdd@cert.org>, "paul.wouters@aiven.io" <paul.wouters@aiven.io>, "housley@vigilsec.com" <housley@vigilsec.com>, "tim.hollebeek@digicert.com" <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>
CC: "ietf104729@di-mgt.com.au" <ietf104729@di-mgt.com.au>, "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
Thread-Index: AQHZGTLbYQi5VJX//U2aUs3jOadQeK6DZtpA
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 14:59:19 +0000
Message-ID: <e0a55a7333b242358ad62736f83cea46@amazon.com>
References: <20221226140309.320A1AFB68@rfcpa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221226140309.320A1AFB68@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.37.240.172]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/QFdOKl08uFd76J7inAldhUP7atU>
Subject: Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8702 (7288)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 14:59:32 -0000
Unfortunately, this is a valid erratum. It was a nit in the text, we should have said " SHAKE128 or SHAKE256 output ..." Thanks to David for finding it. -----Original Message----- From: Spasm <spasm-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of RFC Errata System Sent: Monday, December 26, 2022 9:03 AM To: pkampana@cisco.com; quynh.dang@nist.gov; rdd@cert.org; paul.wouters@aiven.io; housley@vigilsec.com; tim.hollebeek@digicert.com Cc: ietf104729@di-mgt.com.au; spasm@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8702 (7288) CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8702, "Use of the SHAKE One-Way Hash Functions in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7288 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: David Ireland <ietf104729@di-mgt.com.au> Section: 3.4 Original Text ------------- If absent, the SHAKE256 output length used in KMAC is 32 or 64 bytes, respectively, Corrected Text -------------- If absent, the SHAKE128 or SHAKE256 output length used in KMAC is 32 or 64 bytes, respectively, Notes ----- The adverb 'Respectively' requires two parallel structures. SHAKE128=>32, SHAKE256=>64. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8702 (draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-18) -------------------------------------- Title : Use of the SHAKE One-Way Hash Functions in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Publication Date : January 2020 Author(s) : P. Kampanakis, Q. Dang Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ Spasm mailing list Spasm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
- [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8702 (7288) RFC Errata System
- Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8702 (… Kampanakis, Panos