IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] dtaft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates and rsaKeyLen

Tomas Gustavsson <tomas.gustavsson@primekey.com> Wed, 16 September 2020 05:37 UTC

Return-Path: <tomas.gustavsson@primekey.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE253A0C9D for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 22:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=primekey.com header.b=oOxD1513; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=primekey.com header.b=oOxD1513
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lgKV7hhjC_zV for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 22:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.primekey.com (mail.primekey.com [84.55.121.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AA3C3A0C7C for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 22:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.primekey.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.primekey.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F8396AA34D6 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:37:05 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=primekey.com; s=mail; t=1600234625; bh=QmoUH+lFft1FSEhGPgFf4mrJ5j/XEbZQ3mOoKeaRtHI=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=oOxD1513OjVPhV8gXHdgcPtvw0/vS2lwyeTkgCxlWH6Kx+s7gq3c0zx+UtFjuc1ch Ym2asBJHAsRFOT09vbcHgGXOUnMWzVVUqOD0esn3uQg36enVmA628be8jHUqXIxExy B/QAZJ9HD+Guc7n696Jk2xxnOFMtor4pDBikoUwE=
Received: from [10.99.0.112] (unknown [213.136.51.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.primekey.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30D956AA34D5 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:37:05 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=primekey.com; s=mail; t=1600234625; bh=QmoUH+lFft1FSEhGPgFf4mrJ5j/XEbZQ3mOoKeaRtHI=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=oOxD1513OjVPhV8gXHdgcPtvw0/vS2lwyeTkgCxlWH6Kx+s7gq3c0zx+UtFjuc1ch Ym2asBJHAsRFOT09vbcHgGXOUnMWzVVUqOD0esn3uQg36enVmA628be8jHUqXIxExy B/QAZJ9HD+Guc7n696Jk2xxnOFMtor4pDBikoUwE=
To: spasm@ietf.org
References: <AM0PR10MB2418651EF480383C1FBAD448FE440@AM0PR10MB2418.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <ECF4A046-3690-4B8A-9851-935CDACA89C2@vigilsec.com>
From: Tomas Gustavsson <tomas.gustavsson@primekey.com>
Autocrypt: addr=tomas.gustavsson@primekey.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsBNBEyuwwYBCAD31Jsxn1lf7rnFc7y3Ol+TE7pU7ohO78kMdoVrZdAMnU9W0P33GedbU+kF 8/RFq7HlXV8a91RkgtdcMAK8tSdtBKDGZCOJZm5qOZ/EHikY8k/7s1wgSQSF4hYSG/IABCCA W139joDFl4L3buWyk2lsYX1HDBpuXGDL5HFyu165T0ZVlt23T04xmAwpIHUViKUWw1QYnlRz s66Desn2WeP+X8/QlqF1zOTUXbgrThB1X/Oh2+wzP08HVoTQCzlrEMeb9x2k+oa8PtVdnflh nZKBtyyBkZxRoHG3tNKcaf7JLoadSXcSKSKvfApcsxpP2JpkQgIhLi3JWik/Z+RR2WD1ABEB AAHNMFRvbWFzIEd1c3RhdnNzb24gPHRvbWFzLmd1c3RhdnNzb25AcHJpbWVrZXkuY29tPsLA dwQTAQgAIQUCWX8yTAIbIwULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRBibcSbAEP+QGAU CAC82dn8XCQ8Ei7gxQAdRSc2imaP/388i/ObDMYhNhg5j4gXs3tkfxuCvhwkzskUFgOtmaEy uz/gIiVjQIsjQrHh5tl9M0q2tqbDHJpWfE6/SkXPUmTqQ0VGyq1MmZ3/zg2jSoll74qBSfdH V7sWugRXeCBxfaPeYo8DdPCGi27yrdL8zb3xkJ3BxPcDGNdkLm+Yza+qAOrssCD7MSLN+6Sd ML5Xcmw6pgRPlQ0aCsM7scrwgBNb7KrwxaqBxqwcuqF0NMgNjeiEHi2Oj3HOZdYU4Blk2GFq 9zHuCzTWumgNOlfksZ9K3ZMJBn6KLPot5bVXIKdnHwWRzoKMDxkSZjM5zsBNBEyuwwYBCADZ 98eCFQ64zKo1OKkUgEJHO1JdsiqRO1znu6KyaTcd2vXfOCGkFFVBL+vjzzyyYV7Sg1/AaG4r l9TKJCwvx8mUmTJkKQspTfOj6AY33bmfMB/8LBYj2BjtxXyMucPjNTJqbL2r1HeGPV2nwyof MAyo2qcYuiLs20Ob7U8vooOV3GDDKEkXtJYZzTEU6qabGsepGIvMu770OZwvm4akQiCGe5sQ 4+/UH1pMZQNi+/fGbONFx+TUVMM8EkXD6dQ5WoL+xPabPjqiUmR7EBvg0uocr70Ag93tWk1d 4RgFcicjwMFcPg4TZ8Y/3Y7Nmbyo14+4SMNfNPFLgQMawL+cLLkdABEBAAHCwF8EGAECAAkC GwwFAlYXhXUACgkQYm3EmwBD/kA2igf/QNpPe7sLt3KdRD3x4cStxGjLCWyj7x1YLVnV4Nnu TvaNhC+KHx3uG39y1x3PJQwslpeSQ6JipOUmxeQjjGJGQZLV41L1PCJVhCL98Dinr6dJkYB7 cAVhfmW8PI51jiANExLZu8U5gnthj5CGv4428ODQgSoRI0demG3HmVCNrKdap+orhT8zRkq8 DuHTO01U7PKsfvQ2k8AqSAC/JjMOs1mpFe032IApXxlZkE+33Q3dE5BiJmICYg8hsRXvpKTm ZMCdNZJUQLq+XNpg6RtAPQIPMmCepXrE9M/KuH+jFS2G5+Hx5VBSM644E1G2i+HOPCVdHjof iaNi3V/ItEG3jw==
Message-ID: <15c09f53-c446-b376-06e8-122198988c6d@primekey.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:37:05 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ECF4A046-3690-4B8A-9851-935CDACA89C2@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/RRyi-gV63GfUiX6zyTbD88klABE>
Subject: Re: [lamps] dtaft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates and rsaKeyLen
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 05:37:12 -0000

How about if the oid is RSA-PSS? We've started seing such OIDs lately
(mostly by mistake).

Regards,
Tomas

On 2020-09-15 23:20, Russ Housley wrote:
> Hendrik:
> 
> The ASN.1 modules add rsaKeyLen, but the body of the document does not say anything.  I think it should explain the new field.
> 
> The ASN.1 module comment is the only hint right now:
> 
>       -- Any reasonable RSA key length, if subjectPublicKeyInfo
>       -- of the certTemplate has the OID rsaEncryption.
> 
> Also, if the certTemplate has the OID id-ecPublicKey, is a similar convention needed to provide a list of supported curves?
> 
> Russ
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email