IETF Logo Mail Archive

[lamps] dtaft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates and rsaKeyLen

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 15 September 2020 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA0793A0D5C for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nXwOdpH3RG_S for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FC4F3A0D5D for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A60300B69 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:20:47 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id piE83Z6KNCKx for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:20:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 423D9300AA2; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:20:46 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.15\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR10MB2418651EF480383C1FBAD448FE440@AM0PR10MB2418.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:20:47 -0400
Cc: "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <ECF4A046-3690-4B8A-9851-935CDACA89C2@vigilsec.com>
References: <AM0PR10MB2418651EF480383C1FBAD448FE440@AM0PR10MB2418.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
To: "Brockhaus, Hendrik" <hendrik.brockhaus@siemens.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/up-TYFhI4vI9mFPsBOS86qxNugc>
Subject: [lamps] dtaft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates and rsaKeyLen
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 21:20:52 -0000

Hendrik:

The ASN.1 modules add rsaKeyLen, but the body of the document does not say anything.  I think it should explain the new field.

The ASN.1 module comment is the only hint right now:

      -- Any reasonable RSA key length, if subjectPublicKeyInfo
      -- of the certTemplate has the OID rsaEncryption.

Also, if the certTemplate has the OID id-ecPublicKey, is a similar convention needed to provide a list of supported curves?

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email