Re: [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8649 (6451)
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Thu, 04 March 2021 15:59 UTC
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853773A0EEB for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 07:59:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KrBDstkQPOxE for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 07:59:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DD673A0EAD for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 07:59:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 124FxOFe028150 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 4 Mar 2021 10:59:29 -0500
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 07:59:23 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>, spasm@ietf.org, Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>
Message-ID: <20210304155923.GR56617@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <20210304035309.8C3ABF4075D@rfc-editor.org> <47B3A38F-C5C8-4276-9186-C5B34CE5FC0A@vigilsec.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <47B3A38F-C5C8-4276-9186-C5B34CE5FC0A@vigilsec.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/SoC5WkzUcEgSg7Rus7l49JFXP58>
Subject: Re: [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8649 (6451)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 15:59:40 -0000
My sense was that it is spam that the RFC Editor should just delete outright, rather than reject. -Ben On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 10:26:26AM -0500, Russ Housley wrote: > I cannot make heads or tails of this report. Please reject it. > > Russ > > > > On Mar 3, 2021, at 10:53 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8649, > > "Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension". > > > > -------------------------------------- > > You may review the report below and at: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6451 > > > > -------------------------------------- > > Type: Editorial > > Reported by: Wimonrat Faruekham <Wimonrat2323@gmail.com> > > > > Section: 2119 > > > > Original Text > > ------------- > > RFC > > > > Corrected Text > > -------------- > > RFC3031 > > > > Notes > > ----- > > RFC3031 > > > > Instructions: > > ------------- > > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > > > -------------------------------------- > > RFC8649 (draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-07) > > -------------------------------------- > > Title : Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension > > Publication Date : August 2019 > > Author(s) : R. Housley > > Category : INFORMATIONAL > > Source : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME > > Area : Security > > Stream : IETF > > Verifying Party : IESG > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Spasm mailing list > > Spasm@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm > > _______________________________________________ > Spasm mailing list > Spasm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
- [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8649 (6451) RFC Errata System
- Re: [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8649 (… Russ Housley
- Re: [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8649 (… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8649 (… Chris Smiley