IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] DRAFT LAMPS WG Agenda for IETF 104

"Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com> Tue, 26 February 2019 21:14 UTC

Return-Path: <pkampana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79ABD130E7A for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 13:14:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id el_QjAe_DnsW for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 13:13:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A18CB129A87 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 13:13:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=603; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1551215638; x=1552425238; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=vHyeOJfTZIE77XCjdiB1T2aHguWv+sWDSQHs9X5oNxs=; b=KOmJV7hx2UvWOeULQ/8koLg8p7SlRGkifvQvyuHNxz2gnGegxJJRFq2A 1rfrvK3PNIR3kPrlSAHlSSkDrqxfb0lhvJ4zviZwHSq8//6f5cmeqIScw dzYzKe8oWzJp7dUk4AuDNco6lU5pUHFMxnPiEZYeafjdp5YRg6gt1/itZ c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ADAADDq3Vc/5JdJa1lGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBggNngQMnCowYjWqYHoF7CwEBGAuESQKEAiI0CQ0BAwEBAgEBAm0cDIVKAQEBAQMBATg0CwwEAgEIEQQBAR8QJwsdCAIEDgUIgxmBcg+sS4otBYxIF4FAP4QjgUGBXQEBh0ICo2UJApJeIYFkkTacbgIRFIEoHziBVnAVO4Jsix6FP0ExkTSBHwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,416,1544486400"; d="scan'208";a="241438242"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Feb 2019 21:13:37 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-007.cisco.com (xch-aln-007.cisco.com [173.36.7.17]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x1QLDbf6024661 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 26 Feb 2019 21:13:37 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-010.cisco.com (173.36.7.20) by XCH-ALN-007.cisco.com (173.36.7.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:13:36 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-010.cisco.com ([173.36.7.20]) by XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com ([173.36.7.20]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:13:36 -0600
From: "Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
CC: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lamps] DRAFT LAMPS WG Agenda for IETF 104
Thread-Index: AQHUzemkqOy5TkirDUqM8MjeAlBN+qXyrEaA///hmjA=
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 21:13:36 +0000
Message-ID: <e7de0f65d34f42d589f3ec61cb78b2db@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com>
References: <1B5E3413-3102-4A1E-A202-065EC9F8D86C@vigilsec.com> <a6db197f-e48b-e81f-80b6-b651c56be3b3@eff.org>
In-Reply-To: <a6db197f-e48b-e81f-80b6-b651c56be3b3@eff.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.241.79]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.17, xch-aln-007.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/_gvKIL2Uq4RtF9DOvijhxAP0Tl8>
Subject: Re: [lamps] DRAFT LAMPS WG Agenda for IETF 104
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 21:14:01 -0000

Hi Russ,
I take it the same goes for draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake and draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes? 
Panos

-----Original Message-----
From: Spasm <spasm-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Jacob Hoffman-Andrews
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 11:39 AM
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>; SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lamps] DRAFT LAMPS WG Agenda for IETF 104

I think we don't need a slot for RFC 6844 bis. We're just waiting on AD review now.

_______________________________________________
Spasm mailing list
Spasm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email