IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] DRAFT LAMPS WG Agenda for IETF 104

Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org> Tue, 26 February 2019 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <jsha@eff.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030F11200ED for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 08:38:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eff.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zun4NRFznFh8 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 08:38:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.eff.org (mail2.eff.org [173.239.79.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 837C212F1A5 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 08:38:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eff.org; s=mail2; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version: Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=60vwclfKvbtr9wO7rGgzSSOQSkdLojAO2cTOQZgQzJs=; b=GtjLY8NFc4ybePkfLrtxrnbLYT jhhYGgnsDmsrFjs67ObSAy+S7nDe6B/PaXdBneBa2NxeiAwkmG/GqXEkrViWqAvS03xwiXLBLOGK5 TkUa8jQgpo/xQMkocWrJ1ZPGljNNMcSHaJs1WeoYLtq8NqL+VFxjmkji721toRdOVgzQ=;
Received: ; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 08:38:54 -0800
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
References: <1B5E3413-3102-4A1E-A202-065EC9F8D86C@vigilsec.com>
From: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
Message-ID: <a6db197f-e48b-e81f-80b6-b651c56be3b3@eff.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 08:38:53 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1B5E3413-3102-4A1E-A202-065EC9F8D86C@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/oDUsojz40qXlfxT3sTyCmdsMpvo>
Subject: Re: [lamps] DRAFT LAMPS WG Agenda for IETF 104
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:38:58 -0000

I think we don't need a slot for RFC 6844 bis. We're just waiting on AD 
review now.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email