[lamps] [Errata Verified] RFC9481 (7800)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 07 February 2024 17:47 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421B9C14F74E; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 09:47:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.657
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.657 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8K7f2G62aPc3; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 09:47:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70DAAC14F6F2; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 09:47:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 4793218FA484; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 09:47:01 -0800 (PST)
To: housley@vigilsec.com, hendrik.brockhaus@siemens.com, hans.aschauer@siemens.com, mike.ounsworth@entrust.com, john.gray@entrust.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, spasm@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240207174701.4793218FA484@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 09:47:01 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/aR7Er2cW6MooouJ_QoYTO7OO-XQ>
Subject: [lamps] [Errata Verified] RFC9481 (7800)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: This is the mail list for the LAMPS Working Group <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 17:47:05 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC9481, "Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) Algorithms". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7800 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Date Reported: 2024-02-07 Verified by: RFC Editor Section: 6.2.3 Original Text ------------- The KMAC algorithm is defined in [RFC8702] and FIPS SP 800-185 [NIST.SP.800-185]]. Corrected Text -------------- The KMAC algorithm is defined in [RFC8702] and NIST SP 800-185 [NIST.SP.800-185]. Notes ----- Correct two errors. First, the referenced document is a Special Publication, not a FIPS. Second, there are two closing brackets, but there should only be one. -------------------------------------- RFC9481 (draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-algorithms-15) -------------------------------------- Title : Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) Algorithms Publication Date : November 2023 Author(s) : H. Brockhaus, H. Aschauer, M. Ounsworth, J. Gray Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME Area : Security Stream : IETF
- [lamps] [Errata Verified] RFC9481 (7800) RFC Errata System