Re: [lamps] shepherd writeup: draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce/

I was waiting to see is anyone raised concerns with the write-up.  No one did.

The document is now with the IESG.  You can see the states in the IESG process here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/help/state/draft/iesg <https://datatracker.ietf.org/help/state/draft/iesg>

Russ

> On Jun 2, 2020, at 10:09 PM, Mohit Sahni <mohit06jan@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> {OFF LIST}
> 
> Hi Russ,
> I am sorry I am not aware of the whole process, just wanted to check what are the next steps now? Is there anything pending on my end?
> 
> Thanks
> Mohit
> 
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 10:02 AM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com <mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>> wrote:
> Thanks for catching my failure to answer the proper question.  Now fixed:
> 
> (11) Identify any ID nits the Document Shepherd has found in this
> document.  (See http://www.ietf.org/tools/idnits/ <http://www.ietf.org/tools/idnits/> and the Internet-Drafts
> Checklist).  Boilerplate checks are not enough; this check needs to be
> thorough.
> 
>   IDnits reports:
>   -- The draft header indicates that this document updates RFC6960, but the
>      abstract doesn't seem to directly say this.  It does mention RFC6960
>      though, so this could be OK.
>   The Abstract includes "This document updates the RFC 6960"..
>   This warning seems to be the result of "the" or a missing period.
> 
> Russ
> 
> > On May 18, 2020, at 10:56 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
> > 
> > Is the answer to #11 a non-sequiture?  (However you spell it.)
> > 
> > It also specifies a recommendation for minimum, is that worth mentioning?
> > 
> > 
> > On 5/16/20, 2:21 PM, "Russ Housley" <housley@vigilsec.com <mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>> wrote:
> > 
> >    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce/shepherdwriteup/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce/shepherdwriteup/>
> > 
> >    Please review and comment.
> > 
> >    Russ
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org <mailto:Spasm@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm